504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28366038)
21. Clinical Outcomes Comparing Two Prosthetic Knee Designs in Individuals with Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation in Turkey.
Yazgan A; Kutlutürk S; Lechler K
Can Prosthet Orthot J; 2021; 4(1):35297. PubMed ID: 37614931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Kinetic adaptations of the intact limb in transfemoral amputees using a microprocessor prosthetic knee.
Persine S; Leteneur S; Gillet C; Bassement J; Charlaté F; Simoneau-Buessinger E
Gait Posture; 2024 Feb; 108():170-176. PubMed ID: 38100955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of gait outcomes for individuals with established unilateral transfemoral amputation following the provision of microprocessor controlled knees in the context of a clinical service.
Carse B; Scott H; Brady L; Colvin J
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Jun; 45(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 34016870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Absent loading response knee flexion: The impact on gait kinetics and centre of mass motion in individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation, and the effect of microprocessor controlled knee provision.
Carse B; Hebenton J; Brady L; Davie-Smith F
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2023 Aug; 108():106061. PubMed ID: 37556922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Distribution of joint work during walking on slopes among persons with transfemoral amputation.
Bonnet X; Villa C; Loiret I; Lavaste F; Pillet H
J Biomech; 2021 Dec; 129():110843. PubMed ID: 34773834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Construct Validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) in Adults With Lower Limb Amputation.
Hafner BJ; Gaunaurd IA; Morgan SJ; Amtmann D; Salem R; Gailey RS
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 Feb; 98(2):277-285. PubMed ID: 27590443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Subject-specific responses to an adaptive ankle prosthesis during incline walking.
Lamers EP; Eveld ME; Zelik KE
J Biomech; 2019 Oct; 95():109273. PubMed ID: 31431348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Kenevo microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee compared with non-microprocessor-controlled knees in individuals older than 65 years in Sweden: A cost-effectiveness and budget-impact analysis.
Kuhlmann A; Hagberg K; Kamrad I; Ramstrand N; Seidinger S; Berg H
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Oct; 46(5):414-424. PubMed ID: 35511441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Transitioning to a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee: Executive functioning during single and dual-task gait.
Ramstrand N; Rusaw DF; Möller SF
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Feb; 44(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 31826702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Osseointegrated Prosthetic Implants for People With Lower-Limb Amputation: A Health Technology Assessment.
Ontario Health (Quality)
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2019; 19(7):1-126. PubMed ID: 31911825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Differences in knee flexion between the Genium and C-Leg microprocessor knees while walking on level ground and ramps.
Lura DJ; Wernke MM; Carey SL; Kahle JT; Miro RM; Highsmith MJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Feb; 30(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 25537443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Symmetry function in gait pattern analysis in patients after unilateral transfemoral amputation using a mechanical or microprocessor prosthetic knee.
Kowal M; Winiarski S; Gieysztor E; Kołcz A; Walewicz K; Borowicz W; Rutkowska-Kucharska A; Paprocka-Borowicz M
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 18(1):9. PubMed ID: 33468184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of microprocessor prosthetic knee on mobility and quality of life in patients with lower limb amputation: a systematic review of the literature.
Thibaut A; Beaudart C; Maertens DE Noordhout B; Geers S; Kaux JF; Pelzer D
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2022 Jun; 58(3):452-461. PubMed ID: 35148043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prosthetic walking after bilateral transfemoral amputation in a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy: a case report.
Kanata Y; Ito T; Yoshida T; Koyama T; Mikami Y; Domen K
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Apr; 46(2):195-198. PubMed ID: 35412526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impacts of Microprocessor-Controlled Versus Non-microprocessor-Controlled Prosthetic Knee Joints Among Transfemoral Amputees on Functional Outcomes: A Comparative Study.
Alzeer AM; Bhaskar Raj N; Shahine EM; Nadiah WA
Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24331. PubMed ID: 35607529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Functional performance differences between the Genium and C-Leg prosthetic knees and intact knees.
Highsmith MJ; Kahle JT; Miro RM; Cress ME; Lura DJ; Quillen WS; Carey SL; Dubey RV; Mengelkoch LJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2016; 53(6):753-766. PubMed ID: 27997673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Kinematics in the terminal swing phase of unilateral transfemoral amputees: microprocessor-controlled versus swing-phase control prosthetic knees.
Mâaref K; Martinet N; Grumillier C; Ghannouchi S; André JM; Paysant J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jun; 91(6):919-25. PubMed ID: 20510984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Microprocessor prosthetic ankles: comparative biomechanical evaluation of people with transtibial traumatic amputation during standing on level ground and slope.
Thomas-Pohl M; Villa C; Davot J; Bonnet X; Facione J; Lapeyre E; Bascou J; Pillet H
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jan; 16(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 31535903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Benefits of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees to limited community ambulators: systematic review.
Kannenberg A; Zacharias B; Pröbsting E
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(10):1469-96. PubMed ID: 25856664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Stability and Falls Evaluations in AMPutees (SAFE-AMP 1): Microprocessor knee technology reduces odds of incurring an injurious fall for individuals with diabetic/dysvascular amputation.
Wurdeman SR; Miller TA; Stevens PM; Campbell JH
Assist Technol; 2023 May; 35(3):205-210. PubMed ID: 34870561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
