These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28366285)

  • 1. A review of hemodynamic monitoring techniques, methods and devices for the emergency physician.
    Laher AE; Watermeyer MJ; Buchanan SK; Dippenaar N; Simo NCT; Motara F; Moolla M
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1335-1347. PubMed ID: 28366285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound Assessment of the Change in Carotid Corrected Flow Time in Fluid Responsiveness in Undifferentiated Shock.
    Barjaktarevic I; Toppen WE; Hu S; Aquije Montoya E; Ong S; Buhr R; David IJ; Wang T; Rezayat T; Chang SY; Elashoff D; Markovic D; Berlin D; Cannesson M
    Crit Care Med; 2018 Nov; 46(11):e1040-e1046. PubMed ID: 30134304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of bioreactance and carotid Doppler to determine volume responsiveness and blood flow redistribution following passive leg raising in hemodynamically unstable patients.
    Marik PE; Levitov A; Young A; Andrews L
    Chest; 2013 Feb; 143(2):364-370. PubMed ID: 22910834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advanced hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children.
    Lemson J; Nusmeier A; van der Hoeven JG
    Pediatrics; 2011 Sep; 128(3):560-71. PubMed ID: 21824877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical care in the emergency department: monitoring the critically ill patient.
    Andrews FJ; Nolan JP
    Emerg Med J; 2006 Jul; 23(7):561-4. PubMed ID: 16794104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple physiologic algorithm for managing hemodynamics using stroke volume and stroke volume variation: physiologic optimization program.
    McGee WT
    J Intensive Care Med; 2009; 24(6):352-60. PubMed ID: 19736180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemodynamic monitoring in the critical care environment.
    Busse L; Davison DL; Junker C; Chawla LS
    Adv Chronic Kidney Dis; 2013 Jan; 20(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 23265593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemodynamic monitoring in the critically ill: spanning the range of kidney function.
    Davison DL; Patel K; Chawla LS
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2012 May; 59(5):715-23. PubMed ID: 22386582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monitoring: from cardiac output monitoring to echocardiography.
    Jozwiak M; Monnet X; Teboul JL
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2015 Oct; 21(5):395-401. PubMed ID: 26348419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Where are we heading with fluid responsiveness research?
    Vistisen ST; Juhl-Olsen P
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2017 Aug; 23(4):318-325. PubMed ID: 28537997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit.
    Muller JC; Kennard JW; Browne JS; Fecher AM; Hayward TZ
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2012 Jun; 27(3):340-51. PubMed ID: 22593102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resuscitative Cardiopulmonary Ultrasound and Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Emergency Department.
    Teran F
    Emerg Med Clin North Am; 2019 Aug; 37(3):409-430. PubMed ID: 31262412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemodynamic assessment in the contemporary intensive care unit: a review of circulatory monitoring devices.
    Kenaan M; Gajera M; Goonewardena SN
    Crit Care Clin; 2014 Jul; 30(3):413-45. PubMed ID: 24996604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department: a systematic approach.
    Maurer C; Wagner JY; Schmid RM; Saugel B
    Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed; 2017 May; 112(4):326-333. PubMed ID: 26676240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2016 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.
    Saugel B; Bendjelid K; Critchley LA; Rex S; Scheeren TW
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Feb; 31(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 28064413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemodynamic monitoring.
    Hollenberg SM
    Chest; 2013 May; 143(5):1480-1488. PubMed ID: 23648913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemodynamic Monitoring for the Evaluation and Treatment of Shock: What Is the Current State of the Art?
    Suess EM; Pinsky MR
    Semin Respir Crit Care Med; 2015 Dec; 36(6):890-8. PubMed ID: 26595049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional hemodynamic monitoring.
    Pinsky MR; Payen D
    Crit Care; 2005; 9(6):566-72. PubMed ID: 16356240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Volume-limited versus pressure-limited hemodynamic management in septic and nonseptic shock.
    Trof RJ; Beishuizen A; Cornet AD; de Wit RJ; Girbes AR; Groeneveld AB
    Crit Care Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):1177-85. PubMed ID: 22202713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Critical care ultrasonography in circulatory shock.
    Koster G; van der Horst ICC
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2017 Aug; 23(4):326-333. PubMed ID: 28590257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.