These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28366408)

  • 1. Embryo transfer techniques: an American Society for Reproductive Medicine survey of current Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology practices.
    Toth TL; Lee MS; Bendikson KA; Reindollar RH;
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Apr; 107(4):1003-1011. PubMed ID: 28366408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How compliant are in vitro fertilization member clinics in following embryo transfer guidelines? An analysis of 59,689 fresh first in vitro fertilization autologous cycles from 2011 to 2012.
    Keyhan S; Acharya KS; Acharya CR; Yeh JS; Provost MP; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):645-652.e1. PubMed ID: 27268276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assisted reproductive technology use, embryo transfer practices, and birth outcomes after infertility insurance mandates: New Jersey and Connecticut.
    Crawford S; Boulet SL; Jamieson DJ; Stone C; Mullen J; Kissin DM
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 26515377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do donor oocyte cycles comply with ASRM/SART embryo transfer guidelines? An analysis of 13,393 donor cycles from the SART registry.
    Acharya KS; Keyhan S; Acharya CR; Yeh JS; Provost MP; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 27183048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Apr; 107(4):901-903. PubMed ID: 28292618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ASRM standard embryo transfer protocol template: a committee opinion.
    ; Penzias A; Bendikson K; Butts S; Coutifaris C; Falcone T; Fossum G; Gitlin S; Gracia C; Hansen K; Mersereau J; Odem R; Rebar R; Reindollar R; Rosen M; Sandlow J; Vernon M
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Apr; 107(4):897-900. PubMed ID: 28292611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic implications of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology embryo transfer guidelines: healthcare dollars saved by reducing iatrogenic triplets.
    Lee MS; Evans BT; Stern AD; Hornstein MD
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):189-195.e3. PubMed ID: 27037461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changing gender gap and practice patterns in reproductive endocrinology and infertility subspecialists in the United States: a Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility report.
    Stadtmauer L; Sadek S; Richter KS; Amato P; Hurst BS
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Feb; 117(2):421-430. PubMed ID: 34980431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Compassionate embryo transfer: physician practices and perspectives.
    Hairston JC; Kohlmeier A; Feinberg EC
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Sep; 114(3):552-557. PubMed ID: 32654817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. National mosaic embryo transfer practices: a survey.
    Kim TG; Neblett MF; Shandley LM; Omurtag K; Hipp HS; Kawwass JF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Dec; 219(6):602.e1-602.e7. PubMed ID: 30278174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survey assessing obesity policies for assisted reproductive technology in the United States.
    Kaye L; Sueldo C; Engmann L; Nulsen J; Benadiva C
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):703-706.e2. PubMed ID: 26690012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Common practices among consistently high-performing in vitro fertilization programs in the United States: 10-year update.
    Knudtson JF; Robinson RD; Sparks AE; Hill MJ; Chang TA; Van Voorhis BJ
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Jan; 117(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 34674830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is a difficult transfer? Analysis of 7,714 embryo transfers: the impact of maneuvers during embryo transfers on pregnancy rate and a proposal of objective assessment.
    Kava-Braverman A; Martínez F; Rodríguez I; Álvarez M; Barri PN; Coroleu B
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Mar; 107(3):657-663.e1. PubMed ID: 28089573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Practice of embryo transfer: recommendations during and after.
    Tıras B; Cenksoy PO
    Semin Reprod Med; 2014 Jul; 32(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 24919028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Practice patterns, satisfaction, and demographics of reproductive endocrinologists: results of the 2014 Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Workforce Survey.
    Barnhart KT; Nakajima ST; Puscheck E; Price TM; Baker VL; Segars J
    Fertil Steril; 2016 May; 105(5):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 26774576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2004.
    Sullivan EA; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Adamson GD
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1375-90. PubMed ID: 23442757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perinatal outcomes among singletons after assisted reproductive technology with single-embryo or double-embryo transfer versus no assisted reproductive technology.
    Martin AS; Chang J; Zhang Y; Kawwass JF; Boulet SL; McKane P; Bernson D; Kissin DM; Jamieson DJ;
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Apr; 107(4):954-960. PubMed ID: 28292615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pregnancy rates in donor oocyte cycles compared to similar autologous in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 26,457 fresh cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
    Yeh JS; Steward RG; Dude AM; Shah AA; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Aug; 102(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 24842672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aneuploid embryo transfer: clinical policies and provider opinions at United States fertility clinics.
    McGowan R; Pilipenko V; Smolarek TA; West E; Tolusso LK
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Jul; 114(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 32622405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of air bubbles localization and migration after embryo transfer on assisted reproductive technology outcome.
    Fıçıcıoğlu C; Özcan P; Koçer MG; Yeşiladalı M; Alagöz O; Özkara G; Tayyar AT; Altunok Ç
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):310-314.e1. PubMed ID: 29306491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.