226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28366447)
1. Measuring the condylar unit in condylar hyperplasia: from the sigmoid notch or from the mandibular lingula?
Fariña R; Bravo R; Villanueva R; Valladares S; Hinojosa A; Martinez B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 46(7):857-860. PubMed ID: 28366447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3-Dimensional CBCT analysis of mandibular asymmetry in unilateral condylar hyperplasia.
Nolte JW; Verhoeven TJ; Schreurs R; Bergé SJ; Karssemakers LH; Becking AG; Maal TJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec; 44(12):1970-1976. PubMed ID: 27818059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of maxillary and mandibular changes after high condylectomy combined with orthodontic treatment for active unilateral condylar hyperplasia.
Wu C; Meng Q; Deng M; Cai H; Ke J; Long X
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 56(8):692-697. PubMed ID: 30057074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. No differences in morphological characteristics between hyperplastic condyle and class III condyle.
Goulart DR; Muñoz P; Olate S; de Moraes M; Fariña R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 44(10):1281-6. PubMed ID: 26112995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative Evaluation of Condylar Volume Between Patients With Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia and Class III Dentofacial Deformity.
Goulart DR; Muñoz P; Cantín López MG; de Moraes M; Olate S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 75(1):180-188. PubMed ID: 27720720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D analysis of condylar remodelling and skeletal relapse following bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomies.
Xi T; Schreurs R; van Loon B; de Koning M; Bergé S; Hoppenreijs T; Maal T
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 43(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 25779607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mandibular ramus height and condyle distance asymmetries in individuals with different facial growth patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Lemes CR; Tozzi CF; Gribel S; Gribel BF; Venezian GC; do Carmo Menezes C; Custodio W
Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Feb; 43(2):267-274. PubMed ID: 32965519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of condylar head surface changes on mandibular position in patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis.
Seo YJ; Park SB; Kim YI; Ok SM; Kim SS; Son WS
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1380-3. PubMed ID: 26209414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular condyle position in patients with deviated mandibular prognathism.
Lee JS; Xi T; Kwon TG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Aug; 46(8):1052-1058. PubMed ID: 28302336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Panoramic imaging is not suitable for quantitative evaluation, classification, and follow up in unilateral condylar hyperplasia.
Nolte JW; Karssemakers LH; Grootendorst DC; Tuinzing DB; Becking AG
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 53(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 25798757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescent patients with cleft lip and palate evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.
Celikoglu M; Halicioglu K; Buyuk SK; Sekerci AE; Ucar FI
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 24182585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Condylar hyperplasia: current thinking.
Higginson JA; Bartram AC; Banks RJ; Keith DJW
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 56(8):655-662. PubMed ID: 30115459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Technetium-99m bone scintigraphy and mandibular condylar hyperplasia.
Henderson MJ; Wastie ML; Bromige M; Selwyn P; Smith A
Clin Radiol; 1990 Jun; 41(6):411-4. PubMed ID: 2383957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of bimaxillary surgery on adaptive condylar head remodeling: metric analysis and image interpretation using cone-beam computed tomography volume superimposition.
Park SB; Yang YM; Kim YI; Cho BH; Jung YH; Hwang DS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1951-9. PubMed ID: 22104132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low condylectomy as the sole treatment for active condylar hyperplasia: facial, occlusal and skeletal changes. An observational study.
Fariña R; Pintor F; Pérez J; Pantoja R; Berner D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Feb; 44(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 25468628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of condylar asymmetry in different skeletal patterns with cone-beam CT].
Li WY; Chen WJ; Hou W; Qin JW; Duan YF; Mu JQ
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2019 Oct; 28(5):523-528. PubMed ID: 32274486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of SPECT to evaluate growth cessation of the mandible in unilateral condylar hyperplasia.
Pripatnanont P; Vittayakittipong P; Markmanee U; Thongmak S; Yipintsoi T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jun; 34(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 16053843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of bone architecture in various forms of unilateral condylar hyperplasia.
Machoň V; Bartoš M; Suchý T; Levorová J; Foltán R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jan; 52(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 35680482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D analysis of maxillomandibular morphology in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent individuals: A cross-sectional study.
Reis AS; Copello FM; de Castro ACR; Cevidanes LHS; do Rego MV; Visconti MA; Ruellas ACO
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov; 26(4):687-694. PubMed ID: 37246594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dimension and Location of the Mandibular Lingula: Comparisons of Gender and Skeletal Patterns Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Hsu KJ; Tseng YC; Liang SW; Hsiao SY; Chen CM
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():2571534. PubMed ID: 32149093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
