467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28366452)
1. Lateral ridge augmentation with Bio-Oss alone or Bio-Oss mixed with particulate autogenous bone graft: a systematic review.
Aludden HC; Mordenfeld A; Hallman M; Dahlin C; Jensen T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Aug; 46(8):1030-1038. PubMed ID: 28366452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft in animals: a systematic review.
Jensen T; Schou S; Stavropoulos A; Terheyden H; Holmstrup P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 41(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 22000958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft: a systematic review.
Jensen T; Schou S; Stavropoulos A; Terheyden H; Holmstrup P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 21443592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term studies (five or more years) assessing maxillary sinus floor augmentation.
Starch-Jensen T; Aludden H; Hallman M; Dahlin C; Christensen AE; Mordenfeld A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 47(1):103-116. PubMed ID: 28545806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute.
Schlegel KA; Fichtner G; Schultze-Mosgau S; Wiltfang J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12608669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone vs. a bovine-derived xenograft - a 5-year retrospective study.
Lutz R; Berger-Fink S; Stockmann P; Neukam FW; Schlegel KA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Jun; 26(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 25906198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone.
Felice P; Marchetti C; Piattelli A; Pellegrino G; Checchi V; Worthington H; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2008; 1(3):183-98. PubMed ID: 20467621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of titanium mesh for staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation: clinical and histologic-histomorphometric evaluation.
Proussaefs P; Lozada J
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(5):237-47. PubMed ID: 17069168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vertical ridge augmentation by expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and a combination of intraoral autogenous bone graft and deproteinized anorganic bovine bone (Bio Oss).
Simion M; Fontana F; Rasperini G; Maiorana C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):620-9. PubMed ID: 17877463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Volumetric changes of the graft after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios: a radiographic study in minipigs.
Jensen T; Schou S; Svendsen PA; Forman JL; Gundersen HJ; Terheyden H; Holmstrup P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Aug; 23(8):902-10. PubMed ID: 22044477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone-to-implant contact after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios in mini pigs.
Jensen T; Schou S; Gundersen HJ; Forman JL; Terheyden H; Holmstrup P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):635-44. PubMed ID: 22530746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants.
Hatano N; Shimizu Y; Ooya K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Jun; 15(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 15142097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement?
Aghaloo TL; Moy PK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22 Suppl():49-70. PubMed ID: 18437791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Horizontal ridge augmentation with a collagen membrane and a combination of particulated autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 25 patients.
Urban IA; Nagursky H; Lozada JL; Nagy K
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 23593623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histomorphometric analysis of natural bone mineral for maxillary sinus augmentation.
John HD; Wenz B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 15101590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reconstruction of severely resorbed alveolar ridge crests with dental implants using a bovine bone mineral for augmentation.
Hising P; Bolin A; Branting C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 11280367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microvessel density in alveolar ridge regeneration with autologous and alloplastic bone.
Piattelli A; Degidi M; Di Stefano DA; Rubini C; Fioroni M; Strocchi R
Implant Dent; 2002; 11(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 12518705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of the regenerative effect of sinus bone grafting with platelet-rich fibrin-mixed Bio-OssĀ® and commercial fibrin-mixed Bio-OssĀ®: an experimental study.
Xuan F; Lee CU; Son JS; Jeong SM; Choi BH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):e47-50. PubMed ID: 23911120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of intraorally harvested autogenous block grafts for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation: a human study.
Proussaefs P; Lozada J
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Aug; 25(4):351-63. PubMed ID: 16089043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of ramus autogenous block grafts for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation and implant placement: a pilot study.
Proussaefs P; Lozada J; Kleinman A; Rohrer MD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 11958407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]