174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28367904)
1. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Using the Multiple Dipole-inversion Combination with k-space Segmentation Method.
Sato R; Shirai T; Taniguchi Y; Murase T; Bito Y; Ochi H
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Oct; 16(4):340-350. PubMed ID: 28367904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction using annihilating filter-based low-rank Hankel matrix approach.
Ahn HS; Park SH; Ye JC
Magn Reson Med; 2020 Mar; 83(3):858-871. PubMed ID: 31468595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A method for estimating and removing streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Li W; Wang N; Yu F; Han H; Cao W; Romero R; Tantiwongkosi B; Duong TQ; Liu C
Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():111-22. PubMed ID: 25536496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human brain atlas for automated region of interest selection in quantitative susceptibility mapping: application to determine iron content in deep gray matter structures.
Lim IA; Faria AV; Li X; Hsu JT; Airan RD; Mori S; van Zijl PC
Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 82():449-69. PubMed ID: 23769915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative susceptibility mapping for investigating subtle susceptibility variations in the human brain.
Schweser F; Sommer K; Deistung A; Reichenbach JR
Neuroimage; 2012 Sep; 62(3):2083-100. PubMed ID: 22659482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using deep neural network: QSMnet.
Yoon J; Gong E; Chatnuntawech I; Bilgic B; Lee J; Jung W; Ko J; Jung H; Setsompop K; Zaharchuk G; Kim EY; Pauly J; Lee J
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():199-206. PubMed ID: 29894829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Whole head quantitative susceptibility mapping using a least-norm direct dipole inversion method.
Sun H; Ma Y; MacDonald ME; Pike GB
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():166-175. PubMed ID: 29906634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A modulated closed form solution for quantitative susceptibility mapping--a thorough evaluation and comparison to iterative methods based on edge prior knowledge.
Khabipova D; Wiaux Y; Gruetter R; Marques JP
Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():163-174. PubMed ID: 25463463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MEDI+0: Morphology enabled dipole inversion with automatic uniform cerebrospinal fluid zero reference for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Liu Z; Spincemaille P; Yao Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y
Magn Reson Med; 2018 May; 79(5):2795-2803. PubMed ID: 29023982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhancing k-space quantitative susceptibility mapping by enforcing consistency on the cone data (CCD) with structural priors.
Wen Y; Wang Y; Liu T
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Feb; 75(2):823-30. PubMed ID: 25752805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. QSMART: Quantitative susceptibility mapping artifact reduction technique.
Yaghmaie N; Syeda WT; Wu C; Zhang Y; Zhang TD; Burrows EL; Brodtmann A; Moffat BA; Wright DK; Glarin R; Kolbe S; Johnston LA
Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117701. PubMed ID: 33484853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. STrategically Acquired Gradient Echo (STAGE) imaging, part I: Creating enhanced T1 contrast and standardized susceptibility weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Chen Y; Liu S; Wang Y; Kang Y; Haacke EM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():130-139. PubMed ID: 29056394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Model resolution-based deconvolution for improved quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Mathew RS; Paluru N; Yalavarthy PK
NMR Biomed; 2024 Feb; 37(2):e5055. PubMed ID: 37803940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Iterative projection onto convex sets for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Deng W; Boada F; Poser BA; Schirda C; Stenger VA
Magn Reson Med; 2015 Feb; 73(2):697-703. PubMed ID: 24604410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with large dynamic range.
Wei H; Dibb R; Zhou Y; Sun Y; Xu J; Wang N; Liu C
NMR Biomed; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1294-303. PubMed ID: 26313885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using a superposed dipole inversion method: Application to intracranial hemorrhage.
Sun H; Kate M; Gioia LC; Emery DJ; Butcher K; Wilman AH
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Sep; 76(3):781-91. PubMed ID: 26414757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An improved FSL-FIRST pipeline for subcortical gray matter segmentation to study abnormal brain anatomy using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM).
Feng X; Deistung A; Dwyer MG; Hagemeier J; Polak P; Lebenberg J; Frouin F; Zivadinov R; Reichenbach JR; Schweser F
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 39():110-122. PubMed ID: 28188873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subcortical gray matter segmentation and voxel-based analysis using transverse relaxation and quantitative susceptibility mapping with application to multiple sclerosis.
Cobzas D; Sun H; Walsh AJ; Lebel RM; Blevins G; Wilman AH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1601-10. PubMed ID: 25980643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Technical Note: Optimization of quantitative susceptibility mapping by streaking artifact detection.
Wu ML; Wang CK; Lin PY; Chao TC
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5715-5722. PubMed ID: 32945538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morphology-adaptive total variation for the reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility map from the magnetic resonance imaging phase.
Guo L; Mei Y; Guan J; Tan X; Xu Y; Chen W; Feng Q; Feng Y
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196922. PubMed ID: 29738526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
