These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28368177)
1. Testing small variance priors using prior-posterior predictive p values. Hoijtink H; van de Schoot R Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):561-569. PubMed ID: 28368177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computing Bayes factors from data with missing values. Hoijtink H; Gu X; Mulder J; Rosseel Y Psychol Methods; 2019 Apr; 24(2):253-268. PubMed ID: 29999379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Corrected goodness-of-fit test in covariance structure analysis. Hayakawa K Psychol Methods; 2019 Jun; 24(3):371-389. PubMed ID: 29771549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Hoijtink H; Mulder J; van Lissa C; Gu X Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):539-556. PubMed ID: 30742472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adapting fit indices for Bayesian structural equation modeling: Comparison to maximum likelihood. Garnier-Villarreal M; Jorgensen TD Psychol Methods; 2020 Feb; 25(1):46-70. PubMed ID: 31180693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Living with p values: resurrecting a Bayesian perspective on frequentist statistics. Greenland S; Poole C Epidemiology; 2013 Jan; 24(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 23232611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hopes and cautions in implementing Bayesian structural equation modeling. MacCallum RC; Edwards MC; Cai L Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):340-5; discussion 346-53. PubMed ID: 22962888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian versus frequentist hypotheses testing in clinical trials with dichotomous and countable outcomes. Zaslavsky BG J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Sep; 20(5):985-97. PubMed ID: 20721786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantifying explained variance in multilevel models: An integrative framework for defining R-squared measures. Rights JD; Sterba SK Psychol Methods; 2019 Jun; 24(3):309-338. PubMed ID: 29999378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Response surface analysis with multilevel data: Illustration for the case of congruence hypotheses. Nestler S; Humberg S; Schönbrodt FD Psychol Methods; 2019 Jun; 24(3):291-308. PubMed ID: 30816727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are effect sizes and confidence levels problems for or solutions to the null hypothesis test? Riopelle AJ J Gen Psychol; 2000 Apr; 127(2):198-216. PubMed ID: 10843262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gaining power in multiple testing of interval hypotheses via conditionalization. Ellis JL; Pecanka J; Goeman JJ Biostatistics; 2020 Apr; 21(2):e65-e79. PubMed ID: 30247521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determining synchrony between behavioral time series: An application of surrogate data generation for establishing falsifiable null-hypotheses. Moulder RG; Boker SM; Ramseyer F; Tschacher W Psychol Methods; 2018 Dec; 23(4):757-773. PubMed ID: 29595296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Posterior calibration of posterior predictive p values. van Kollenburg GH; Mulder J; Vermunt JK Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):382-396. PubMed ID: 28594229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Misinterpreting p: The discrepancy between p values and the probability the null hypothesis is true, the influence of multiple testing, and implications for the replication crisis. Anderson SF Psychol Methods; 2020 Oct; 25(5):596-609. PubMed ID: 31829657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using expert knowledge for test linking. Bolsinova M; Hoijtink H; Vermeulen JA; Béguin A Psychol Methods; 2017 Dec; 22(4):705-724. PubMed ID: 28368175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]