These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28368189)

  • 1. Commercial motor vehicle driving performance: An examination of attentional resources and control using a driving simulator.
    McManus B; Heaton K; Stavrinos D
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Jun; 23(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 28368189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The useful field of view assessment predicts simulated commercial motor vehicle driving safety.
    McManus B; Heaton K; Vance DE; Stavrinos D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Oct; 17(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 26890935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fluctuating attentional demand in a simulated driving assessment: the roles of age and driving complexity.
    Stinchcombe A; Gagnon S; Zhang JJ; Montembeault P; Bedard M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):576-87. PubMed ID: 22133333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Malleable attentional resources theory: a new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance.
    Young MS; Stanton NA
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 12502155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of differences in the functioning of the neurocognitive attentional networks on drivers' performance.
    Roca J; Crundall D; Moreno-Ríos S; Castro C; Lupiáñez J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1193-206. PubMed ID: 23084094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between driving simulation performance and obstructive sleep apnoea risk, daytime sleepiness, obesity and road traffic accident history of commercial drivers in Turkey.
    Demirdöğen Çetinoğlu E; Görek Dilektaşlı A; Demir NA; Özkaya G; Acet NA; Durmuş E; Ursavaş A; Karadağ M; Ege E
    Sleep Breath; 2015 Sep; 19(3):865-72. PubMed ID: 25604475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of voice technology on test track driving performance: implications for driver distraction.
    Ranney TA; Harbluk JL; Noy YI
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(2):439-54. PubMed ID: 16170949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of Non-Driving Related Task Modalities on Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving.
    Wandtner B; Schömig N; Schmidt G
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):870-881. PubMed ID: 29617161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Secondary Task Engagement on Adolescents' Driving Performance and Crash Risk.
    Klauer SG; Ehsani JP; McGehee DV; Manser M
    J Adolesc Health; 2015 Jul; 57(1 Suppl):S36-43. PubMed ID: 26112736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Potential benefits and costs of concurrent task engagement to maintain vigilance: a driving simulator investigation.
    Atchley P; Chan M
    Hum Factors; 2011 Feb; 53(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 21469529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Young adult drivers' sensitivity to changes in speed and driving mode in a simple vehicle simulator.
    Min YK; Chung SC; You JH; Yi JH; Lee B; Tack GR; Chun JH; Park MS; Min BC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Aug; 103(1):197-209. PubMed ID: 17037661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Hazard Detection Failures Are a Matter of Time.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29513611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the training and testing of entry-level commercial motor vehicle drivers.
    Morgan JF; Tidwell S; Medina A; Blanco M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Jul; 43(4):1400-7. PubMed ID: 21545872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrophysiological correlates of attentional monitoring during a complex driving simulation task.
    Gianfranchi E; Mento G; Duma GM; Chierchia C; Sarlo M; Tagliabue M
    Biol Psychol; 2020 Jul; 154():107918. PubMed ID: 32534108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An electrophysiological study of the impact of a Forward Collision Warning System in a simulator driving task.
    Bueno M; Fabrigoule C; Deleurence P; Ndiaye D; Fort A
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1470():69-79. PubMed ID: 22765914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implications of task-induced fatigue effects for in-vehicle countermeasures to driver fatigue.
    Desmond PA; Matthews G
    Accid Anal Prev; 1997 Jul; 29(4):515-23. PubMed ID: 9248510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age differences in cognitive and psychomotor abilities and simulated driving.
    Shanmugaratnam S; Kass SJ; Arruda JE
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):802-8. PubMed ID: 20380906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Task-induced fatigue states and simulated driving performance.
    Matthews G; Desmond PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):659-86. PubMed ID: 12047065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adverse effects of anxiety on attentional control differ as a function of experience: A simulated driving study.
    Gotardi GC; Polastri PF; Schor P; Oudejans RRD; van der Kamp J; Savelsbergh GJP; Navarro M; Rodrigues ST
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():41-47. PubMed ID: 30487108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of auditory signals to the operation of an agricultural vehicle: results of pilot testing.
    Karimi D; Mondor TA; Mann DD
    J Agric Saf Health; 2008 Jan; 14(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 18376536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.