These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28368197)
1. Shared reality in intergroup communication: Increasing the epistemic authority of an out-group audience. Echterhoff G; Kopietz R; Higgins ET J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jun; 146(6):806-825. PubMed ID: 28368197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How Group Perception Affects What People Share and How People Feel: The Role of Entitativity and Epistemic Trust in the "Saying-Is-Believing" Effect. Liang T; Lin Z; Souma T Front Psychol; 2021; 12():728864. PubMed ID: 34630240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How communication goals determine when audience tuning biases memory. Echterhoff G; Higgins ET; Kopietz R; Groll S J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 18248126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Audience-tuning effects on memory: the role of shared reality. Echterhoff G; Higgins ET; Groll S J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Sep; 89(3):257-76. PubMed ID: 16248713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biased memory retrieval in the service of shared reality with an audience: The role of cognitive accessibility. Wagner U; Higgins ET; Axmacher N; Echterhoff G J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jun; 153(6):1605-1627. PubMed ID: 38661635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Audience-Tuning Effect of Negative Stereotypes in Communication. Ye J; Zhao L; Huang Z; Meng F Front Psychol; 2021; 12():663814. PubMed ID: 34354632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How shared reality is created in interpersonal communication. Echterhoff G; Schmalbach B Curr Opin Psychol; 2018 Oct; 23():57-61. PubMed ID: 29331878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Audience tuning effects in the context of situated and embodied processes. Semin GR Curr Opin Psychol; 2018 Oct; 23():113-116. PubMed ID: 29533879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fairness in Knowing: Science Communication and Epistemic Justice. Medvecky F Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1393-1408. PubMed ID: 28939945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Communicating with the crowd: speakers use abstract messages when addressing larger audiences. Joshi PD; Wakslak CJ J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):351-62. PubMed ID: 23544655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Communication and deniability: Moral and epistemic reactions to denials. Bonalumi F; Bumin FB; Scott-Phillips T; Heintz C Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1073213. PubMed ID: 36687811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. (Why) do I think what you think? Epistemic social tuning and implicit prejudice. Lun J; Sinclair S; Whitchurch ER; Glenn C J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Dec; 93(6):957-72. PubMed ID: 18072848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation. Jost JT; van der Linden S; Panagopoulos C; Hardin CD Curr Opin Psychol; 2018 Oct; 23():77-83. PubMed ID: 29427900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multi-audience tracking with RGB-D camera on digital signage. Low CC; Ong LY; Koo VC; Leow MC Heliyon; 2020 Sep; 6(9):e05107. PubMed ID: 33024875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Framing political messages to fit the audience's regulatory orientation: how to improve the efficacy of the same message content. Mannetti L; Brizi A; Giacomantonio M; Higgins ET PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77040. PubMed ID: 24130831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prejudice on the stage: self-monitoring and the public expression of group attitudes. Klein O; Snyder M; Livingston RW Br J Soc Psychol; 2004 Jun; 43(Pt 2):299-314. PubMed ID: 15285836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Remembering in conversations: the social sharing and reshaping of memories. Hirst W; Echterhoff G Annu Rev Psychol; 2012; 63():55-79. PubMed ID: 21961946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When Similarity Strikes Back: Conditional Persuasive Effects of Character-Audience Similarity in Anti-Smoking Campaign. Kim M Hum Commun Res; 2019 Jan; 45(1):52-77. PubMed ID: 30631219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diversity in in-group bias: structural factors, situational features, and social functions. Scheepers D; Spears R; Doosje B; Manstead AS J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jun; 90(6):944-60. PubMed ID: 16784344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of recommendation algorithm's information flow on targeted advertising audience's coping behavior. Chen L; Sun R; Yuan Y; Zhan X Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Mar; 243():104168. PubMed ID: 38309222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]