BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28368524)

  • 1. The Health Impact of Adult Cervical Deformity in Patients Presenting for Surgical Treatment: Comparison to United States Population Norms and Chronic Disease States Based on the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions Questionnaire.
    Smith JS; Line B; Bess S; Shaffrey CI; Kim HJ; Mundis G; Scheer JK; Klineberg E; O'Brien M; Hostin R; Gupta M; Daniels A; Kelly M; Gum JL; Schwab FJ; Lafage V; Lafage R; Ailon T; Passias P; Protopsaltis T; Albert TJ; Riew KD; Hart R; Burton D; Deviren V; Ames CP; Group ISS
    Neurosurgery; 2017 May; 80(5):716-725. PubMed ID: 28368524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Despite worse baseline status depressed patients achieved outcomes similar to those in nondepressed patients after surgery for cervical deformity.
    Poorman GW; Passias PG; Horn SR; Frangella NJ; Daniels AH; Hamilton DK; Kim H; Sciubba D; Diebo BG; Bortz CA; Segreto FA; Kelly MP; Smith JS; Neuman BJ; Shaffrey CI; LaFage V; LaFage R; Ames CP; Hart R; Mundis GM; Eastlack R;
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E10. PubMed ID: 29191101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of Life and General Health After Elective Surgery for Cervical Spine Pathologies: Determining a Valid and Responsive Metric of Health State Utility.
    Chotai S; Parker SL; Sivaganesan A; Godil SS; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
    Neurosurgery; 2015 Oct; 77(4):553-60; discussion 560. PubMed ID: 26191977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical Versus Thoracolumbar Spinal Deformities: A Comparison of Baseline Quality-of-Life Burden.
    Passias PG; Poorman GW; Lafage V; Smith J; Ames C; Schwab F; Shaffrey C; Segreto FA; Horn SR; Bortz CA; Varlotta CG; Hockley A; Wang C; Daniels A; Neuman B; Hart R; Burton D; Javidan Y; Line B; LaFage R; Bess S; Sciubba D;
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Dec; 31(10):413-419. PubMed ID: 30371600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of life outcomes following cervical decompression for coexisting Parkinson's disease and cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Xiao R; Miller JA; Lubelski D; Alberts JL; Mroz TE; Benzel EC; Krishnaney AA; Machado AG
    Spine J; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1358-1366. PubMed ID: 27496286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation of quality of life and functional outcome measures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Lubelski D; Alvin MD; Nesterenko S; Sundar SJ; Thompson NR; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 26613280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
    Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One-year Postoperative Radiographic and Patient-reported Outcomes Following Cervical Deformity Correction Are Not Affected by a Short-term Unplanned Return to the OR.
    Fourman MS; Lafage R; Ames C; Smith JS; Passias PG; Shaffrey CI; Mundis G; Protopsaltis T; Gupta M; Klineberg EO; Bess S; Lafage V; Kim HJ;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Jul; 48(14):1026-1032. PubMed ID: 36856490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Health Impact of Symptomatic Adult Spinal Deformity: Comparison of Deformity Types to United States Population Norms and Chronic Diseases.
    Bess S; Line B; Fu KM; McCarthy I; Lafage V; Schwab F; Shaffrey C; Ames C; Akbarnia B; Jo H; Kelly M; Burton D; Hart R; Klineberg E; Kebaish K; Hostin R; Mundis G; Mummaneni P; Smith JS;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Feb; 41(3):224-33. PubMed ID: 26571174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating EQ-5D values from the Neck Disability Index and numeric rating scales for neck and arm pain.
    Carreon LY; Bratcher KR; Das N; Nienhuis JB; Glassman SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 24905392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of cervical spine surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1203-9. PubMed ID: 24076442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of differences between patient and general population EQ-5D-3L values on the mean tariff scores of different patient groups.
    Little MH; Reitmeir P; Peters A; Leidl R
    Value Health; 2014 Jun; 17(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 24968996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-reported chronic conditions and EQ-5D index scores in the US adult population.
    Ko Y; Coons SJ
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2006 Oct; 22(10):2065-71. PubMed ID: 17031907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting the EuroQol Group's EQ-5D index from CDC's "Healthy Days" in a US sample.
    Jia H; Zack MM; Moriarty DG; Fryback DG
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(1):174-85. PubMed ID: 20375418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diabetes Is Related to Worse Patient-Reported Outcomes at Two Years Following Spine Surgery.
    Armaghani SJ; Archer KR; Rolfe R; Demaio DN; Devin CJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 98(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 26738899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective Multicenter Assessment of All-Cause Mortality Following Surgery for Adult Cervical Deformity.
    Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Kim HJ; Passias P; Protopsaltis T; Lafage R; Mundis GM; Klineberg E; Lafage V; Schwab FJ; Scheer JK; Miller E; Kelly M; Hamilton DK; Gupta M; Deviren V; Hostin R; Albert T; Riew KD; Hart R; Burton D; Bess S; Ames CP;
    Neurosurgery; 2018 Dec; 83(6):1277-1285. PubMed ID: 29351637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mapping the clinical chronic obstructive pulmonary disease questionnaire onto generic preference-based EQ-5D values.
    Boland MR; van Boven JF; Kocks JW; van der Molen T; Goossens LM; Chavannes NH; Rutten-van Mölken MP
    Value Health; 2015 Mar; 18(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 25773566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative importance of the EQ-5D five dimensions among patients with chronic diseases in South Korea - a comparison with the general population preference weights.
    Hong J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Aug; 16(1):159. PubMed ID: 30075726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of population health status in six european countries: results of a representative survey using the EQ-5D questionnaire.
    König HH; Bernert S; Angermeyer MC; Matschinger H; Martinez M; Vilagut G; Haro JM; de Girolamo G; de Graaf R; Kovess V; Alonso J;
    Med Care; 2009 Feb; 47(2):255-61. PubMed ID: 19169128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Population-based normative data for the Scoliosis Research Society 22r questionnaire in adolescents and adults, including a comparison with EQ-5D.
    Diarbakerli E; Grauers A; Gerdhem P
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Jun; 26(6):1631-1637. PubMed ID: 27832361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.