These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28369841)

  • 1. Attentional capture in driving displays.
    Arexis M; Maquestiaux F; Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Didierjean A
    Br J Psychol; 2017 May; 108(2):259-275. PubMed ID: 28369841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A salient and task-irrelevant collinear structure hurts visual search.
    Tseng CH; Jingling L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124190. PubMed ID: 25909986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the P
    Kerzel D; Burra N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1170-1183. PubMed ID: 31967520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional capture by completely task-irrelevant faces.
    Sato S; Kawahara JI
    Psychol Res; 2015 Jul; 79(4):523-33. PubMed ID: 25030814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Involuntary attentional capture by task-irrelevant objects that match the search template for category detection in natural scenes.
    Reeder RR; van Zoest W; Peelen MV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1070-80. PubMed ID: 25810159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.
    Burra N; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 23418888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence reveals the effects of trait anxiety on contingent attentional capture.
    Tsai YC; Lu HJ; Chang CF; Liang WK; Muggleton NG; Juan CH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 17(5):973-983. PubMed ID: 28656503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional capture decreases when distractors remain visible during rapid serial visual presentations.
    Inukai T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):939-50. PubMed ID: 20436191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.
    Adam KCS; Serences JT
    J Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 41(38):8007-8022. PubMed ID: 34330776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anticipatory Distractor Suppression Elicited by Statistical Regularities in Visual Search.
    Wang B; van Driel J; Ort E; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 31(10):1535-1548. PubMed ID: 31180265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence that proactive distractor suppression does not require attentional resources.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Tolomeo D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Jun; 31(3):1376-1386. PubMed ID: 38049572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Failed Suppression of Salient Stimuli Precedes Behavioral Errors.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Busch NA; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 32(2):367-377. PubMed ID: 31702429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 29309194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Salient-but-irrelevant stimuli cause attentional capture in difficult, but attentional suppression in easy visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 28752665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrophysiological evidence of low salience distractor interference during visual search.
    Fortier-Gauthier U; Jolicœur P
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13068. PubMed ID: 29423999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
    Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
    Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.