BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 283703)

  • 1. Interobserver reliability in xeroradiographic cephalometry.
    Hurst RV; Schwaninger B; Shaye R
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Feb; 75(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 283703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Landmark identification accuracy in xeroradiographic cephalometry.
    Hurst RV; Schwaninger B; Shaye R; Chadha JM
    Am J Orthod; 1978 May; 73(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 277070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cephalometric appraisal of xeroradiography.
    Chate RA
    Am J Orthod; 1980 May; 77(5):547-67. PubMed ID: 6929162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
    Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Xeroradiographic study of rheumatoid arthritis hand (author's transl)].
    Orzincolo C; Scutellari PN; Delli Gatti I
    Radiol Med; 1980 Dec; 66(12):927-32. PubMed ID: 7232779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiologic exposure conditions and resultant skin doses in application of xeroradiography to the orthodontic diagnosis.
    Nakasima A; Nakata S; Shimizu K; Takahama Y
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Dec; 78(6):646-56. PubMed ID: 6935964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Chang HF; Chen KC
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 11036999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Radiographic and xeroradiographic case finding in asbestosis].
    Caprotti M; Grossi P; Tomarchio O; Bertoli G
    G Ital Med Lav; 1983 Mar; 5(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 6671503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of xeroradiographs with conventional lateral skull radiographs.
    Erskine RB
    Br J Orthod; 1978 Oct; 5(4):193-5. PubMed ID: 290389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Xeroradiography applied to cephalometry].
    Calura G; Mannella P; Tartari E; Nonato M; Parma S; Baraldi A; Benea G; Borrelli M
    Riv Ital Stomatol; 1983 Sep; 52(9):665-74. PubMed ID: 6592735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Caries detection with xeroradiographs: the influence of observer experience.
    White SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jul; 64(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 3475648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the influence of patient positioning on the reliability of lateral cephalometry.
    David OT; Tuce RA; Munteanu O; Neagu A; Panainte I
    Radiol Med; 2017 Jul; 122(7):520-529. PubMed ID: 28271360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Digital cephalometric teleradiography with storage phosphors. Comparative study].
    Nessi R; Garattini G; Blanc M; Marzano L; Pignanelli C; Uslenghi C
    Radiol Med; 1993 Apr; 85(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 8516464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
    Chien PC; Parks ET; Eraso F; Hartsfield JK; Roberts WE; Ofner S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jul; 38(5):262-73. PubMed ID: 19474253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of dental xeroradiographs in periodontics. Comparison with conventional radiographs.
    Gratt BM; Sickles EA; Armitage GC
    J Periodontol; 1980 Jan; 51(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 6928465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A critical evaluation of xerocephalometry: absorbed dose and diagnostic information.
    Kaugars GE; Fatouros PP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Apr; 57(4):443-50. PubMed ID: 6584844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of cephalometric landmarks in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: are there alternatives for point A, ANS, and PNS?
    Bongaarts CA; van't Hof MA; Prahl-Andersen B; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2008 Jan; 45(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18215102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is there consistency in cephalometric landmark identification amongst oral and maxillofacial surgeons?
    Miloro M; Borba AM; Ribeiro-Junior O; Naclério-Homem MG; Jungner M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 43(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 24055177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Xeroradiography for cephalometric analysis.
    Johnson NA
    Am J Orthod; 1976 May; 69(5):524-6. PubMed ID: 1063543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.