These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 283703)

  • 21. A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam CT scans and conventional frontal radiographs of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Swennen GR; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 19369033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Inter- and intra-observer identification of landmarks used in the Delaire analysis.
    Haynes S; Chau MN
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Feb; 15(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8436201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of image quality on the identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    McWilliam JS; Welander U
    Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 272131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal T; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Cephalometry Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
    Cassetta M; Altieri F; Di Giorgio R; Silvestri A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 26(4):e311-5. PubMed ID: 26080244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Swennen GR; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 67(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 19070753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mandibular growth estimated by four cephalometric measurements.
    Hägg U; Attström K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Aug; 102(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 1636632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The accuracy of cephalometric tracing superimposition.
    Gliddon MJ; Xia JJ; Gateno J; Wong HT; Lasky RE; Teichgraeber JF; Jia X; Liebschner MA; Lemoine JJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 16413890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Xeroradiographic evaluation of obstructive lesions of the larynx and trachea.
    Heller RM; Kirchner SG; O'Neill JA
    J Pediatr Surg; 1981 Oct; 16(5):691-3. PubMed ID: 7310602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Cephalometric diagnosis of maxillodental anomalies of the basal-distal relationship].
    da Cruz JP
    Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac; 1985; 26(3):suppl 227-69. PubMed ID: 4081482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patient radiation dose in conventional and xerographic cephalography.
    Copley RL; Glaze SA; Bushong SC; West DC
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Nov; 76(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 292313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of xeroradiography for length determination in endodontics.
    San Marco PA; Montgomery S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 6584820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Xeroradiography of dental structures. III. Pilot clinical studies.
    Gratt BM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Sep; 48(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 289933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Phosphor-stimulated computed cephalometry: reliability of landmark identification.
    Lim KF; Foong KW
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 9459029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Possibilities of dose reduction in lateral cephalometric radiographs and its effects on clinical diagnostics.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17329587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Diagnostic yield of conventional and digital cephalometric images: a human cadaver study.
    Gijbels F; Bou Serhal C; Willems G; Bosmans H; Sanderink G; Persoons M; Jacobs R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 11313730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Errors in setting the landmarks on xero-cephalogram.
    Nakasima A; Nakata S; Simizu K; Takahama Y
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Dec; 39(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 6938608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Confidence region of alveolar bone level on xeroradiography].
    Noda M
    Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi; 1989 Jun; 31(2):593-607. PubMed ID: 2637302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.