These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28370401)
1. Cyclophosphamide-based stem cell mobilization in relapsed multiple myeloma patients: A subgroup analysis from the phase III trial ReLApsE. Baertsch MA; Schlenzka J; Lisenko K; Krzykalla J; Becker N; Weisel K; Noppeney R; Martin H; Lindemann HW; Haenel M; Nogai A; Scheid C; Salwender H; Fenk R; Graeven U; Reimer P; Schmidt-Hieber M; Goerner M; Schmidt-Wolf IGH; Klein S; Ho AD; Goldschmidt H; Wuchter P Eur J Haematol; 2017 Jul; 99(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 28370401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intermediate-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel induction therapies. Hamadani M; Kochuparambil ST; Osman S; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Bunner P; Watkins K; Morrison D; Speir E; Deremer D; Kota V; Jillella A; Craig M; Awan F Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2012 Jul; 18(7):1128-35. PubMed ID: 22248715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The VAD chemotherapy regimen plus a G-CSF dose of 10 microg/kg is as effective and less toxic than high-dose cyclophosphamide plus a G-CSF dose of 5 microg/kg for progenitor cell mobilization: results from a monocentric study of 82 patients. Lefrère F; Zohar S; Ghez D; Delarue R; Audat F; Suarez F; Hermine O; Damaj G; Maillard N; Ribeil JA; Azagury M; Misbahi R; Jondeau K; Cavazzana-Calvo M; Dal Cortivo L; Varet B Bone Marrow Transplant; 2006 Apr; 37(8):725-9. PubMed ID: 16518433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intermediate-dose CY and G-CSF more efficiently mobilize adequate numbers of PBSC for tandem autologous PBSC transplantation compared with low-dose CY in patients with multiple myeloma. Hiwase DK; Bollard G; Hiwase S; Bailey M; Muirhead J; Schwarer AP Cytotherapy; 2007; 9(6):539-47. PubMed ID: 17882718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two dose levels of cyclophosphamide for successful stem cell mobilization in myeloma patients. Winkelmann N; Desole M; Hilgendorf I; Ernst T; Sayer HG; Kunert C; Mügge LO; Hochhaus A; Scholl S J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2016 Dec; 142(12):2603-2610. PubMed ID: 27640002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma. Lin TL; Wang PN; Kuo MC; Hung YH; Chang H; Tang TC J Clin Apher; 2016 Oct; 31(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 26340986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Optimization of mobilization regimes of blood hemopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma]. Pokrovskaia OS; Mendeleeva LP; Urnova ES; Gaponova TV; Gribanova EO; Alekseeva IV; Drokov MIu; Kalinin NN; Gretsov EM; Kliasova GA; Savchenko VG Ter Arkh; 2011; 83(7):50-7. PubMed ID: 21894752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Higher efficacy of intermediate dose cytarabine + G-CSF compared to cyclophosphamide + G-CSF in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma. Bogucka-Fedorczuk A; Czyz A; Kalicińska E; Sawicki M; Laszkowska-Lewko M; Wicherska-Pawłowska K; Rybka J; Szeremet A; Prajs I; Szymczak D; Wróbel T J Clin Apher; 2020 Aug; 35(4):246-254. PubMed ID: 32298020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimal chemo-mobilization for the collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma. Song GY; Jung SH; Ahn SY; Jung SY; Yang DH; Ahn JS; Kim HJ; Lee JJ BMC Cancer; 2019 Jan; 19(1):59. PubMed ID: 30642286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function. Alexander ET; Towery JA; Miller AN; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Squires JE; Stuart RK; Costa LJ Transfusion; 2011 Sep; 51(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21392017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cyclophosphamide-based hematopoietic stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Tuchman SA; Bacon WA; Huang LW; Long G; Rizzieri D; Horwitz M; Chute JP; Sullivan K; Morris Engemann A; Yopp A; Li Z; Corbet K; Chao N; Gasparetto C J Clin Apher; 2015 Jun; 30(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 25293363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma. Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vinorelbine plus intermediate dose cyclophosphamide is an effective and safe regimen for the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma. Annunziata M; Celentano M; Pocali B; D'Amico MR; Palmieri S; Viola A; Copia C; Falco C; Del Vecchio L; Ferrara F Ann Hematol; 2006 Jun; 85(6):394-9. PubMed ID: 16538502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of on-demand plerixafor added to chemotherapy and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma. Milone G; Martino M; Leotta S; Spadaro A; Zammit V; Cupri A; Avola G; Camuglia MG; Di Marco A; Scalzulli P; Morelli M; Olivieri A; Tripepi G Leuk Lymphoma; 2018 Jan; 59(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 28573902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of Plerixafor or Cyclophosphamide Combined with G-CSF in Mobilization of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells in Multiple Myeloma]. Li WT; Ma LM; Lian Y; Wang QG; Gao ZJ; Zhao S Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Oct; 31(5):1403-1409. PubMed ID: 37846691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone. Alegre A; Tomás JF; Martínez-Chamorro C; Gil-Fernández JJ; Fernández-Villalta MJ; Arranz R; Díaz MA; Granda A; Bernardo MR; Escudero A; López-Lorenzo JL; Fernández-Rañada JM Bone Marrow Transplant; 1997 Aug; 20(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9257889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of engraftment following different stem cell mobilization modalities in patients with multiple myeloma treated with a uniform induction regimen containing bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone. Benyamini N; Avivi I; Dann EJ; Zuckerman T; Lavi N; Katz T Ann Hematol; 2017 Mar; 96(3):461-467. PubMed ID: 28013359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors influencing collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma. Demirer T; Buckner CD; Gooley T; Appelbaum FR; Rowley S; Chauncey T; Lilleby K; Storb R; Bensinger WI Bone Marrow Transplant; 1996 Jun; 17(6):937-41. PubMed ID: 8807097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilisation with G-CSF alone versus G-CSF and cyclophosphamide after bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone induction in multiple myeloma. Chua CC; Lim HY; Chai KL; Ong J; Sim S; Wood C; Dickinson M; Campbell P; Hempton J; King H; Dowsing C; Bergin K; Muir S; Gibbs S; Grigg A Bone Marrow Transplant; 2018 Sep; 53(9):1116-1123. PubMed ID: 29523889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]