171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28371637)
1. Performance of basic kinematic thresholds in the identification of crash and near-crash events within naturalistic driving data.
Perez MA; Sudweeks JD; Sears E; Antin J; Lee S; Hankey JM; Dingus TA
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jun; 103():10-19. PubMed ID: 28371637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Crashes and near-crashes on horizontal curves along rural two-lane highways: Analysis of naturalistic driving data.
Wang B; Hallmark S; Savolainen P; Dong J
J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():163-169. PubMed ID: 29203015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in frequency of occurrence, event characteristics, and pre-impact vehicle kinematics between crashes, near-crashes, and single vehicle conflicts in a large-scale naturalistic driving study.
Perez MA; Sudweeks JD; Sears E; Valente J; Guo F
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(1):32-37. PubMed ID: 36548218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Considering real-world sightline obstructions in crash and injury prevention estimates for left turn across path/opposite direction intersection active safety systems.
Bareiss M; Gabler HC; Sherony R
Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S102-S106. PubMed ID: 33026259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of sleep disorders on driving safety-findings from the Second Strategic Highway Research Program naturalistic driving study.
Liu SY; Perez MA; Lau N
Sleep; 2018 Apr; 41(4):. PubMed ID: 29408974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recognising safety critical events: can automatic video processing improve naturalistic data analyses?
Dozza M; González NP
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Nov; 60():298-304. PubMed ID: 23489911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Defining and screening crash surrogate events using naturalistic driving data.
Wu KF; Jovanis PP
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Dec; 61():10-22. PubMed ID: 23177902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In-depth analysis of crash contributing factors and potential ADAS interventions among at-risk drivers using the SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study.
Seacrist T; Maheshwari J; Sarfare S; Chingas G; Thirkill M; Loeb HS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S68-S73. PubMed ID: 34663136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of pre-crash driving instability in contributing to crash intensity using naturalistic driving data.
Arvin R; Kamrani M; Khattak AJ
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105226. PubMed ID: 31465934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Internal validation of near-crashes in naturalistic driving studies: a continuous and multivariate approach.
Jonasson JK; Rootzén H
Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():102-9. PubMed ID: 24144495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of crash rates and rear-end striking crashes among novice teens and experienced adults using the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study.
Seacrist T; Belwadi A; Prabahar A; Chamberlain S; Megariotis J; Loeb H
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():48-52. PubMed ID: 27586102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploring microscopic driving volatility in naturalistic driving environment prior to involvement in safety critical events-Concept of event-based driving volatility.
Wali B; Khattak AJ; Karnowski T
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105277. PubMed ID: 31514087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Real-time driving risk assessment using deep learning with XGBoost.
Shi L; Qian C; Guo F
Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Dec; 178():106836. PubMed ID: 36191455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring the effects of critical driving situations on driver perception time (PT) using SHRP2 naturalistic driving study data.
Wu KF; Lin YJ
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():94-102. PubMed ID: 30991292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding crashes involving roadway objects with SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study data.
Hao H; Li YE; Medina A; Gibbons RB; Wang L
J Safety Res; 2020 Jun; 73():199-209. PubMed ID: 32563395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using naturalistic driving data to explore the association between traffic safety-related events and crash risk at driver level.
Wu KF; Aguero-Valverde J; Jovanis PP
Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():210-8. PubMed ID: 25086439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of safety-critical events using kinematic vehicle data and the discrete fourier transform.
Kluger R; Smith BL; Park H; Dailey DJ
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():162-168. PubMed ID: 27543893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual Sensory and Visual-Cognitive Function and Rate of Crash and Near-Crash Involvement Among Older Drivers Using Naturalistic Driving Data.
Huisingh C; Levitan EB; Irvin MR; MacLennan P; Wadley V; Owsley C
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Jun; 58(7):2959-2967. PubMed ID: 28605807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring the combined effects of driving situations on freeway rear-end crash risk using naturalistic driving study data.
Wu KK; Wang L
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105866. PubMed ID: 33276188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A synthetic approach to compare the large truck crash causation study and naturalistic driving data.
Hickman JS; Hanowski RJ; Bocanegra J
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Mar; 112():11-14. PubMed ID: 29306085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
