357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28372055)
1. Assessing the efficacy of hearing-aid amplification using a phoneme test.
Scheidiger C; Allen JB; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1739. PubMed ID: 28372055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise.
Miller JD; Watson CS; Leek MR; Dubno JR; Wark DJ; Souza PE; Gordon-Salant S; Ahlstrom JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2933. PubMed ID: 28464618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; D'Aquila LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
Healy EW; Yoho SE; Wang Y; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3029-38. PubMed ID: 24116438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
Goldsworthy RL; Delhorne LA; Braida LD; Reed CM
Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acoustic and perceptual effects of amplitude and frequency compression on high-frequency speech.
Alexander JM; Rallapalli V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):908. PubMed ID: 28863610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem.
Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Swaminathan J
Trends Hear; 2015 Jun; 19():. PubMed ID: 26126896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating hearing aid amplification using idiosyncratic consonant errors.
Abavisani A; Allen JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Dec; 142(6):3736. PubMed ID: 29289077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting effects of hearing-instrument signal processing on consonant perception.
Zaar J; Schmitt N; Derleth RP; DiNino M; Arenberg JG; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):3216. PubMed ID: 29195458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Auditory acclimatization and hearing aids: late auditory evoked potentials and speech recognition following unilateral and bilateral amplification.
Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3560-9. PubMed ID: 24907819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Loudness summation of equal loud narrowband signals in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Ewert SD; Oetting D
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S71-S80. PubMed ID: 28971746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of combined dynamic compression and single channel noise reduction for hearing aid applications.
Kortlang S; Chen Z; Gerkmann T; Kollmeier B; Hohmann V; Ewert SD
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S43-S54. PubMed ID: 28355947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
