These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28372079)

  • 1. Critical bandwidth speech: Arrays of subcritical band speech maintain near-ceiling intelligibility at high amplitudes.
    Warren RM; Bashford JA; Lenz PW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL222. PubMed ID: 28372079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When intelligibilities of paired speech bands do not behave the way they are supposed to.
    Warren RM; Bashford JA; Lenz PW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL244-50. PubMed ID: 23927232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Arrays of rectangular subcritical speech bands: Intelligibility improved by noise-vocoding and expanding to critical bandwidths.
    Warren RM; Bashford JA; Lenz PW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):EL305. PubMed ID: 29716300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intelligibilities of 1-octave rectangular bands spanning the speech spectrum when heard separately and paired.
    Warren RM; Bashford JA; Lenz PW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov; 118(5):3261-6. PubMed ID: 16334905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
    Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spectral redundancy: intelligibility of sentences heard through narrow spectral slits.
    Warren RM; Riener KR; Bashford JA; Brubaker BS
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Feb; 57(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 7885815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maintaining intelligibility at high intensities with arrays of subcritical width speech bands and interpolated noise.
    Bashford JA; Warren RM; Lenz PW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Sep; 142(3):EL299. PubMed ID: 28964061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech based transmission index for all: An intelligibility metric for variable hearing ability.
    Mechergui N; Djaziri-Larbi S; Jaïdane M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1470. PubMed ID: 28372108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition of temporally interrupted and spectrally degraded sentences with additional unprocessed low-frequency speech.
    Başkent D; Chatterjee M
    Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 20817081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multimodal and Spectral Degradation Effects on Speech and Emotion Recognition in Adult Listeners.
    Ritter C; Vongpaisal T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804966. PubMed ID: 30378469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancement of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms: role of amplitude envelope and temporal fine structure.
    Srinivasan NK; Zahorik P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):EL239-45. PubMed ID: 24907828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting contrast effects following reliable spectral properties in speech perception.
    Stilp CE; Anderson PW; Winn MB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3466-76. PubMed ID: 26093434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic richness modulates the neural networks supporting intelligible speech processing.
    Lee YS; Min NE; Wingfield A; Grossman M; Peelle JE
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():108-117. PubMed ID: 26723103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of roving level and spectral range on vowel formant discrimination.
    Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL264-70. PubMed ID: 21974502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Room and head coloration can induce obligatory stream segregation.
    David M; Lavandier M; Grimault N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 24993189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of temporally modified speech in auditory neuropathy.
    Hassan DM
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 21047293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.