These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28372135)

  • 21. Recognition of synthesized vowel sequences in steady-state and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.
    Shen Y; Pearson DV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1835. PubMed ID: 28372131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spatial Release from Masking Using Clinical Corpora: Sentence Recognition in a Colocated or Spatially Separated Speech Masker.
    King G; Corbin NE; Leibold LJ; Buss E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Apr; 31(4):271-276. PubMed ID: 31589139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Enhancing listener strategies using a payoff matrix in speech-on-speech masking experiments.
    Thompson ER; Iyer N; Simpson BD; Wakefield GH; Kieras DE; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1297-304. PubMed ID: 26428768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial Release From Masking Under Different Reverberant Conditions in Young and Elderly Subjects: Effect of Moving or Stationary Maskers at Circular and Radial Conditions.
    Muñoz RV; Aspöck L; Fels J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 62(9):3582-3595. PubMed ID: 31525113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of short-time intensity and envelope power for speech intelligibility and psychoacoustic masking.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1098. PubMed ID: 28863616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The importance of interaural time differences and level differences in spatial release from masking.
    Glyde H; Buchholz JM; Dillon H; Cameron S; Hickson L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL147-52. PubMed ID: 23927217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A corpus of noise-induced word misperceptions for Spanish.
    Tóth MA; García Lecumberri ML; Tang Y; Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL184-9. PubMed ID: 25698048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.
    Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2246-56. PubMed ID: 15139635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Swaminathan J; Roverud E; Clayton KK; Best V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):132. PubMed ID: 27475139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Precedence-based speech segregation in a virtual auditory environment.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov; 118(5):3241-51. PubMed ID: 16334903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.
    Bernstein JG; Iyer N; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):702-13. PubMed ID: 25698005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech Recognition With Informational and Energetic Maskers in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness After Cochlear Implantation.
    Müller V; Lang-Roth R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug; 64(8):3343-3356. PubMed ID: 34310192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Head movements while recognizing speech arriving from behind.
    Shen Y; Folkerts ML; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):EL108. PubMed ID: 28253640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of periodicity in perceiving speech in quiet and in background noise.
    Steinmetzger K; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3586-99. PubMed ID: 26723315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Masking release effects of a standard and a regional linguistic variety.
    Brouwer S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):EL237. PubMed ID: 28863622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of interaural electrode insertion depth difference and independent band selection on sentence recognition in noise and spatial release from masking in simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening.
    Fathima H; Bhat JS; Pitchaimuthu AN
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jul; 280(7):3209-3217. PubMed ID: 36695909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does it take older adults longer than younger adults to perceptually segregate a speech target from a background masker?
    Ben-David BM; Tse VY; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):55-63. PubMed ID: 22609772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech.
    Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Nov; 112(5 Pt 1):2086-98. PubMed ID: 12430820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.