613 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28372143)
1. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
Westermann A; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
Westermann A; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of masker type on early reflection processing and speech intelligibility (L).
Arweiler I; Buchholz JM; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 23297878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.
Best V; Keidser G; Buchholz JM; Freeston K
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):682-90. PubMed ID: 25853616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem.
Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Swaminathan J
Trends Hear; 2015 Jun; 19():. PubMed ID: 26126896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
Christiansen C; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
Collin B; Lavandier M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extension and evaluation of a near-end listening enhancement algorithm for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Rennies J; Drefs J; Hülsmeier D; Schepker H; Doclo S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2526. PubMed ID: 28464693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
Kilman L; Zekveld A; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2015 Apr; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of interaural differences on speech intelligibility in complex multi-talker environments.
Ellinger RL; Jakien KM; Gallun FJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):EL170. PubMed ID: 28253635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise.
Smits C; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3004-15. PubMed ID: 23654404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1375. PubMed ID: 25190410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
