231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28373080)
1. Is a gradual reduction of stiffness on top of posterior instrumentation possible with a suitable proximal implant? A biomechanical study.
Lange T; Schmoelz W; Gosheger G; Eichinger M; Heinrichs CH; Boevingloh AS; Schulte TL
Spine J; 2017 Aug; 17(8):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 28373080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of semirigid junctional fixation techniques to prevent proximal junctional failure after thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity correction.
Doodkorte RJP; Roth AK; Arts JJ; Lataster LMA; van Rhijn LW; Willems PC
Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):855-864. PubMed ID: 33493681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of posterior polyester tethers on the biomechanics of proximal junctional kyphosis: a finite element analysis.
Bess S; Harris JE; Turner AW; LaFage V; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Schwab FJ; Haid RW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jan; 26(1):125-133. PubMed ID: 27611508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transverse process hooks at upper instrumented vertebra provide more gradual motion transition than pedicle screws.
Thawrani DP; Glos DL; Coombs MT; Bylski-Austrow DI; Sturm PF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(14):E826-32. PubMed ID: 24732851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical analysis of a novel posterior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study.
Sethi A; Muzumdar AM; Ingalhalikar A; Vaidya R
Spine J; 2011 Sep; 11(9):863-9. PubMed ID: 21802998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of multilevel posterior ligament dissection after spinal instrumentation on adjacent segment biomechanics as a potential risk factor for proximal junctional kyphosis: a biomechanical study.
Lange T; Schulte TL; Gosheger G; Schulze Boevingloh A; Mayr R; Schmoelz W
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Feb; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 29444669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel pedicle screw and plate system provides superior stability in unilateral fixation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Li J; Xiao H; Zhu Q; Zhou Y; Li C; Liu H; Huang Z; Shang J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0123134. PubMed ID: 25807513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a hinged pedicle screw rod system: an in vitro experiment.
Schmoelz W; Onder U; Martin A; von Strempel A
Eur Spine J; 2009 Oct; 18(10):1478-85. PubMed ID: 19504129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine.
Mageswaran P; Techy F; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 22839756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.
Chen CS; Huang CH; Shih SL
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical effects of hybrid stabilization on the risk of proximal adjacent-segment degeneration following lumbar spinal fusion using an interspinous device or a pedicle screw-based dynamic fixator.
Lee CH; Kim YE; Lee HJ; Kim DG; Kim CH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):643-649. PubMed ID: 28937328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain.
Cunningham BW; Sefter JC; Hu N; Kim SW; Bridwell KH; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):E198-205. PubMed ID: 20195199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical effects of fusion levels on the risk of proximal junctional failure and kyphosis in lumbar spinal fusion surgery.
Park WM; Choi DK; Kim K; Kim YJ; Kim YH
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Dec; 30(10):1162-9. PubMed ID: 26320851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion.
Cheng BC; Gordon J; Cheng J; Welch WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2551-7. PubMed ID: 17978653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Junction kinematics between proximal mobile and distal fused lumbar segments: biomechanical analysis of pedicle and hook constructs.
Hongo M; Gay RE; Zhao KD; Ilharreborde B; Huddleston PM; Berglund LJ; An KN; Zhao C
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):846-53. PubMed ID: 19660990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spinal instrumentation after complete resection of the last lumbar vertebra: an in vitro biomechanical study after L5 spondylectomy.
Bartanusz V; Muzumdar A; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Bucklen B; Khalil S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):1017-21. PubMed ID: 21224772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical investigation of lumbar hybrid stabilization in two-level posterior instrumentation.
Hegewald AA; Hartmann S; Keiler A; Scheufler KM; Thomé C; Schmoelz W
Eur Spine J; 2018 Aug; 27(8):1887-1894. PubMed ID: 29214371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
