356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28373904)
1. Efficiency and equity considerations in the preferences of health policy-makers in Israel.
Shmueli A; Golan O; Paolucci F; Mentzakis E
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2017; 6():18. PubMed ID: 28373904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do the equity-efficiency preferences of the Israeli Basket Committee match those of Israeli health policy makers?
Shmueli A
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2017; 6():20. PubMed ID: 28469840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative analysis of decision maker preferences for equity/efficiency attributes in reimbursement decisions in three European countries.
Baji P; García-Goñi M; Gulácsi L; Mentzakis E; Paolucci F
Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Sep; 17(7):791-9. PubMed ID: 26296623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decision-making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: a discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency.
Mirelman A; Mentzakis E; Kinter E; Paolucci F; Fordham R; Ozawa S; Ferraz M; Baltussen R; Niessen LW
Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 22583464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Equity in HTA: what doesn't get measured, gets marginalised.
Cookson R; Mirelman AJ
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2017; 6():38. PubMed ID: 28694961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Equity and efficiency preferences of health policy makers in China--a stated preference analysis.
Paolucci F; Mentzakis E; Defechereux T; Niessen LW
Health Policy Plan; 2015 Oct; 30(8):1059-66. PubMed ID: 25500745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Priority setting in the Austrian healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment and implications for mental health.
Mentzakis E; Paolucci F; Rubicko G
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2014 Jun; 17(2):61-73. PubMed ID: 25153094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Societal preferences for distributive justice in the allocation of health care resources: a latent class discrete choice experiment.
Skedgel C; Wailoo A; Akehurst R
Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 25145575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decision-makers' preferences for approving new medicines in Wales: a discrete-choice experiment with assessment of external validity.
Linley WG; Hughes DA
Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Apr; 31(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 23516033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dear policy maker: have you made up your mind? A discrete choice experiment among policy makers and other health professionals.
Koopmanschap MA; Stolk EA; Koolman X
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2010 Apr; 26(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20392324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An epidemiological approach towards measuring the trade-off between equity and efficiency in health policy.
Lindholm L; Rosén M; Emmelin M
Health Policy; 1996 Mar; 35(3):205-16. PubMed ID: 10157398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Putting equity in health back onto the social policy agenda: experience from South Africa.
McIntyre D; Gilson L
Soc Sci Med; 2002 Jun; 54(11):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12113446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Weighting must wait: incorporating equity concerns into cost-effectiveness analysis may take longer than expected.
Wailoo A; Tsuchiya A; McCabe C
Pharmacoeconomics; 2009; 27(12):983-9. PubMed ID: 19908923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Choosing Video Instead of In-Clinic Consultations in Primary Care in Israel: Discrete Choice Experiment Among Key Stakeholders-Patients, Primary Care Physicians, and Policy Makers.
Chudner I; Drach-Zahavy A; Karkabi K
Value Health; 2019 Oct; 22(10):1187-1196. PubMed ID: 31563262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is 'health equity' bad for our health? A qualitative empirical ethics study of public health policy-makers' perspectives.
Smith MJ; Thompson A; Upshur REG
Can J Public Health; 2018 Dec; 109(5-6):633-642. PubMed ID: 30465285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Priority setting in the German healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment.
Meusel V; Mentzakis E; Baji P; Fiorentini G; Paolucci F
Int J Health Econ Manag; 2023 Sep; 23(3):411-431. PubMed ID: 37184821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining priority for liver transplantation: a comparison of cost per QALY and discrete choice experiment-generated public preferences.
Ratcliffe J; Buxton M; Young T; Longworth L
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2005; 4(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 16466276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do Social Values and Institutional Context Shape the Use of Economic Evaluation in Reimbursement Decisions? An Empirical Analysis.
Torbica A; Fornaro G; Tarricone R; Drummond MF
Value Health; 2020 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 31952668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How is the use of research evidence in health policy perceived? A comparison between the reporting of researchers and policy-makers.
Ellen ME; Lavis JN; Horowitz E; Berglas R
Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Jul; 16(1):64. PubMed ID: 30029647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
