356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28373904)
21. Health technology prioritization: which criteria for prioritizing new technologies and what are their relative weights?
Golan O; Hansen P; Kaplan G; Tal O
Health Policy; 2011 Oct; 102(2-3):126-35. PubMed ID: 21071107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Primary care physicians in Israel: self-perception of their role in the healthcare system and policy makers' and patients' perception of them as gatekeepers.
Tabenkin H; Gross R; Greenberg SB; Steinmetz D; Elhayany A
Isr Med Assoc J; 2001 Dec; 3(12):893-7. PubMed ID: 11794909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reconciliation of economic concerns and health policy: illustration of an equity adjustment procedure using proportional shortfall.
Stolk EA; van Donselaar G; Brouwer WB; Busschbach JJ
Pharmacoeconomics; 2004; 22(17):1097-107. PubMed ID: 15612829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. What criteria guide national entrepreneurs' policy decisions on user fee removal for maternal health care services? Use of a best-worst scaling choice experiment in West Africa.
Torbica A; De Allegri M; Belemsaga D; Medina-Lara A; Ridde V
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2014 Oct; 19(4):208-15. PubMed ID: 24812202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Explicit incorporation of equity considerations into economic evaluation of public health interventions.
Cookson R; Drummond M; Weatherly H
Health Econ Policy Law; 2009 Apr; 4(Pt 2):231-45. PubMed ID: 19216834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The efficiency-equity trade-off, self-interest, and moral principles in health and safety valuation.
Arroyos-Calvera D; Covey J; Loomes G; McDonald R
Soc Sci Med; 2019 Oct; 238():112477. PubMed ID: 31434030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Examining the attitudes and preferences of health care decision-makers in relation to access, equity and cost-effectiveness: a discrete choice experiment.
Ratcliffe J; Bekker HL; Dolan P; Edlin R
Health Policy; 2009 Apr; 90(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 18937994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Public spending on health care: how are different criteria related?
Musgrove P
Health Policy; 1999 Jun; 47(3):207-23. PubMed ID: 10538919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Which criteria are considered in healthcare decisions? Insights from an international survey of policy and clinical decision makers.
Tanios N; Wagner M; Tony M; Baltussen R; van Til J; Rindress D; Kind P; Goetghebeur MM;
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2013 Oct; 29(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 24290340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Research outcomes informing the selection of public health interventions and strategies to implement them: A cross-sectional survey of Australian policy-maker and practitioner preferences.
Wolfenden L; Hall A; Bauman A; Milat A; Hodder R; Webb E; Mooney K; Yoong S; Sutherland R; McCrabb S
Health Res Policy Syst; 2024 May; 22(1):58. PubMed ID: 38745326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Equity Weights for Priority Setting in Healthcare: Severity, Age, or Both?
Reckers-Droog V; van Exel J; Brouwer W
Value Health; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1441-1449. PubMed ID: 31806201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Balancing equity and efficiency in health priorities in Ghana: the use of multicriteria decision analysis.
Jehu-Appiah C; Baltussen R; Acquah C; Aikins M; d'Almeida SA; Bosu WK; Koolman X; Lauer J; Osei D; Adjei S
Value Health; 2008 Dec; 11(7):1081-7. PubMed ID: 19602214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis.
Defechereux T; Paolucci F; Mirelman A; Youngkong S; Botten G; Hagen TP; Niessen LW
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Feb; 12():39. PubMed ID: 22335815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.
Whitty JA; Lancsar E; Rixon K; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
Patient; 2014; 7(4):365-86. PubMed ID: 24872225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A Scoring Index of Prioritization Factors Between Patients: An Iberian Comparison.
Pinho M; Borges AP
Health Care Manag (Frederick); 2019; 38(3):267-275. PubMed ID: 31261196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An equity framework for health technology assessments.
Culyer AJ; Bombard Y
Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(3):428-41. PubMed ID: 22065143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Estimating sign-dependent societal preferences for quality of life.
Attema AE; Brouwer WB; l'Haridon O; Pinto JL
J Health Econ; 2015 Sep; 43():229-43. PubMed ID: 26263893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Rationing in German health care with particular consideration of oncology: view points of German stakeholders--a qualitative interview study].
Lange J; Gönner C; Vollmann J; Rauprich O
Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Jan; 77(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 24696371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Distributional dilemmas in health policy: large benefits for a few or smaller benefits for many?
Choudhry N; Slaughter P; Sykora K; Naylor CD
J Health Serv Res Policy; 1997 Oct; 2(4):212-6. PubMed ID: 10182249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Thinking about equity in health care.
Williams A
J Nurs Manag; 2005 Sep; 13(5):397-402. PubMed ID: 16108777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
