These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28374510)

  • 1. Can abstract screening workload be reduced using text mining? User experiences of the tool Rayyan.
    Olofsson H; Brolund A; Hellberg C; Silverstein R; Stenström K; Österberg M; Dagerhamn J
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Sep; 8(3):275-280. PubMed ID: 28374510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
    Ouzzani M; Hammady H; Fedorowicz Z; Elmagarmid A
    Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 5(1):210. PubMed ID: 27919275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increasing the efficiency of study selection for systematic reviews using prioritization tools and a single-screening approach.
    Waffenschmidt S; Sieben W; Jakubeit T; Knelangen M; Overesch I; Bühn S; Pieper D; Skoetz N; Hausner E
    Syst Rev; 2023 Sep; 12(1):161. PubMed ID: 37705060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow.
    Pham B; Jovanovic J; Bagheri E; Antony J; Ashoor H; Nguyen TT; Rios P; Robson R; Thomas SM; Watt J; Straus SE; Tricco AC
    Syst Rev; 2021 May; 10(1):156. PubMed ID: 34039433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abstract screening using the automated tool Rayyan: results of effectiveness in three diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews.
    Valizadeh A; Moassefi M; Nakhostin-Ansari A; Hosseini Asl SH; Saghab Torbati M; Aghajani R; Maleki Ghorbani Z; Faghani S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):160. PubMed ID: 35655155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Usefulness of machine learning softwares to screen titles of systematic reviews: a methodological study.
    Dos Reis AHS; de Oliveira ALM; Fritsch C; Zouch J; Ferreira P; Polese JC
    Syst Rev; 2023 Apr; 12(1):68. PubMed ID: 37061711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity and specificity of alternative screening methods for systematic reviews using text mining tools.
    Li J; Kabouji J; Bouhadoun S; Tanveer S; Filion KB; Gore G; Josephson CB; Kwon CS; Jette N; Bauer PR; Day GS; Subota A; Roberts JI; Lukmanji S; Sauro K; Ismaili AA; Rahmani F; Chelabi K; Kerdougli Y; Seulami NM; Soumana A; Khalil S; Maynard N; Keezer MR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 162():72-80. PubMed ID: 37506951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of text mining to reduce screening workload for injury-focused systematic reviews.
    Giummarra MJ; Lau G; Gabbe BJ
    Inj Prev; 2020 Feb; 26(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 31451565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the efficiency of study identification methods in systematic reviews.
    Shemilt I; Khan N; Park S; Thomas J
    Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 5(1):140. PubMed ID: 27535658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pinpointing needles in giant haystacks: use of text mining to reduce impractical screening workload in extremely large scoping reviews.
    Shemilt I; Simon A; Hollands GJ; Marteau TM; Ogilvie D; O'Mara-Eves A; Kelly MP; Thomas J
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):31-49. PubMed ID: 26054024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A text-mining tool generated title-abstract screening workload savings: performance evaluation versus single-human screening.
    Carey N; Harte M; Mc Cullagh L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Sep; 149():53-59. PubMed ID: 35654270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches.
    O'Mara-Eves A; Thomas J; McNaught J; Miwa M; Ananiadou S
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jan; 4(1):5. PubMed ID: 25588314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Twister: A Tool for Reducing Screening Time in Systematic Literature Reviews.
    Kreiner K; Hayn D; Schreier G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 255():5-9. PubMed ID: 30306896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation.
    Harrison H; Griffin SJ; Kuhn I; Usher-Smith JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 31931747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prioritising references for systematic reviews with RobotAnalyst: A user study.
    Przybyła P; Brockmeier AJ; Kontonatsios G; Le Pogam MA; McNaught J; von Elm E; Nolan K; Ananiadou S
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):470-488. PubMed ID: 29956486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effective study selection using text mining or a single-screening approach: a study protocol.
    Waffenschmidt S; Hausner E; Sieben W; Jaschinski T; Knelangen M; Overesch I
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):166. PubMed ID: 30340633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unsupervised title and abstract screening for systematic review: a retrospective case-study using topic modelling methodology.
    Natukunda A; Muchene LK
    Syst Rev; 2023 Jan; 12(1):1. PubMed ID: 36597132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual computer monitors to increase efficiency of conducting systematic reviews.
    Wang Z; Asi N; Elraiyah TA; Abu Dabrh AM; Undavalli C; Glasziou P; Montori V; Murad MH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Dec; 67(12):1353-7. PubMed ID: 25085736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers.
    Rathbone J; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 4():80. PubMed ID: 26073974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.