118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28374569)
1. Graphics for relatedness research.
Galván-Femenía I; Graffelman J; Barceló-I-Vidal C
Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Nov; 17(6):1271-1282. PubMed ID: 28374569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Demerelate: calculating interindividual relatedness for kinship analysis based on codominant diploid genetic markers using R.
Kraemer P; Gerlach G
Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Nov; 17(6):1371-1377. PubMed ID: 28281323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Log-Ratio Biplot Approach for Exploring Genetic Relatedness Based on Identity by State.
Graffelman J; Galván Femenía I; de Cid R; Barceló Vidal C
Front Genet; 2019; 10():341. PubMed ID: 31068965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Friends and family: A software program for identification of unrelated individuals from molecular marker data.
de Jager D; Swarts P; Harper C; Bloomer P
Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Nov; 17(6):e225-e233. PubMed ID: 28503747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benchmarking Relatedness Inference Methods with Genome-Wide Data from Thousands of Relatives.
Ramstetter MD; Dyer TD; Lehman DM; Curran JE; Duggirala R; Blangero J; Mezey JG; Williams AL
Genetics; 2017 Sep; 207(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 28739658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Completion of a worldwide reference panel of samples for an ancestry informative Indel assay.
Santos C; Phillips C; Oldoni F; Amigo J; Fondevila M; Pereira R; Carracedo Á; Lareu MV
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():75-80. PubMed ID: 25840342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Global patterns of STR sequence variation: Sequencing the CEPH human genome diversity panel for 58 forensic STRs using the Illumina ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit.
Phillips C; Devesse L; Ballard D; van Weert L; de la Puente M; Melis S; Álvarez Iglesias V; Freire-Aradas A; Oldroyd N; Holt C; Syndercombe Court D; Carracedo Á; Lareu MV
Electrophoresis; 2018 Nov; 39(21):2708-2724. PubMed ID: 30101987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness.
Wang J
Genet Res; 2007 Jun; 89(3):135-53. PubMed ID: 17894908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical Detection of Relatives Typed with Disjoint Forensic and Biomedical Loci.
Kim J; Edge MD; Algee-Hewitt BFB; Li JZ; Rosenberg NA
Cell; 2018 Oct; 175(3):848-858.e6. PubMed ID: 30318150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Standardized subsets of the HGDP-CEPH Human Genome Diversity Cell Line Panel, accounting for atypical and duplicated samples and pairs of close relatives.
Rosenberg NA
Ann Hum Genet; 2006 Nov; 70(Pt 6):841-7. PubMed ID: 17044859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. RAD-sequencing for estimating genomic relatedness matrix-based heritability in the wild: A case study in roe deer.
Gervais L; Perrier C; Bernard M; Merlet J; Pemberton JM; Pujol B; Quéméré E
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Sep; 19(5):1205-1217. PubMed ID: 31058463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A graphical approach to multi-locus match probability computation: revisiting the product rule.
Song YS; Slatkin M
Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Aug; 72(1):96-110. PubMed ID: 17239909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. GenAPoPop 1.0: A user-friendly software to analyse genetic diversity and structure from partially clonal and selfed autopolyploid organisms.
Stoeckel S; Becheler R; Bocharova E; Barloy D
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jan; 24(1):e13886. PubMed ID: 37902131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A likelihood ratio approach for identifying three-quarter siblings in genetic databases.
Galván-Femenía I; Barceló-Vidal C; Sumoy L; Moreno V; de Cid R; Graffelman J
Heredity (Edinb); 2021 Mar; 126(3):537-547. PubMed ID: 33452467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How Well Do Molecular and Pedigree Relatedness Correspond, in Populations with Diverse Mating Systems, and Various Types and Quantities of Molecular and Demographic Data?
Kopps AM; Kang J; Sherwin WB; Palsbøll PJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Jun; 5(9):1815-26. PubMed ID: 26134496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genotyping-by-sequencing for estimating relatedness in nonmodel organisms: Avoiding the trap of precise bias.
Attard CRM; Beheregaray LB; Möller LM
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 May; 18(3):381-390. PubMed ID: 29160928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating relatedness and inbreeding using molecular markers and pedigrees: the effect of demographic history.
Robinson SP; Simmons LW; Kennington WJ
Mol Ecol; 2013 Dec; 22(23):5779-92. PubMed ID: 24102888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Restriction site-associated DNA sequencing, genotyping error estimation and de novo assembly optimization for population genetic inference.
Mastretta-Yanes A; Arrigo N; Alvarez N; Jorgensen TH; Piñero D; Emerson BC
Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Jan; 15(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 24916682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simplification of genotyping techniques of the ABO blood type experiment and exploration of population genetics.
Hu J; Zhou YR; Ding JL; Wang ZY; Liu L; Wang YK; Lou HL; Qiao SY; Wu YH
Yi Chuan; 2017 May; 39(5):423-429. PubMed ID: 28487274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. swinger: a user-friendly computer program to establish captive breeding groups that minimize relatedness without pedigree information.
Sandoval-Castillo J; Attard CR; Marri S; Brauer CJ; Möller LM; Beheregaray LB
Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Mar; 17(2):278-287. PubMed ID: 27754599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]