These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28374623)
21. Speech Recognition Performance Differences Between Precurved and Straight Electrode Arrays From a Single Manufacturer. Sharma RK; Smetak MR; Patro A; Lindquist NR; Perkins EL; Holder JT; Haynes DS; Tawfik KO Otol Neurotol; 2022 Dec; 43(10):1149-1154. PubMed ID: 36201525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mechanisms of electrode fold-over in cochlear implant surgery when using a flexible and slim perimodiolar electrode array. Ramos-Macias A; R De Miguel A; Falcon-González JC Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 137(11):1129-1135. PubMed ID: 28784019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Role of Electrode Placement in Bilateral Simultaneously Cochlear-Implanted Adult Patients. De Seta D; Nguyen Y; Bonnard D; Ferrary E; Godey B; Bakhos D; Mondain M; Deguine O; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D; Mosnier I Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 155(3):485-93. PubMed ID: 27165685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Degree of modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation. Marrinan MS; Roland JT; Reitzen SD; Waltzman SB; Cohen LT; Cohen NL Otol Neurotol; 2004 May; 25(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 15129107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Relation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Type and Position on Continued Hearing Preservation. Perkins EL; Labadie RF; O'Malley M; Bennett M; Noble JH; Haynes DS; Gifford R Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jul; 43(6):e634-e640. PubMed ID: 35709407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Imaging evaluation of electrode placement and effect on electrode discrimination on different cochlear implant electrode arrays. Ramos de Miguel Á; Argudo AA; Borkoski Barreiro SA; Falcón González JC; Ramos Macías A Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jun; 275(6):1385-1394. PubMed ID: 29610960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children. Wackym PA; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Reeder RM; Raulie JC Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Further Evidence of the Relationship Between Cochlear Implant Electrode Positioning and Hearing Outcomes. Chakravorti S; Noble JH; Gifford RH; Dawant BM; O'Connell BP; Wang J; Labadie RF Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun; 40(5):617-624. PubMed ID: 31083083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cochlear's unique electrode portfolio now and in the future. von Wallenberg E; Briggs R Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S59-61. PubMed ID: 24869446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Perimodiolar Electrodes: Imaging and Electrophysiological Outcomes. Mewes A; Brademann G; Hey M Otol Neurotol; 2020 Aug; 41(7):e934-e944. PubMed ID: 32658111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of intraoperative CT scanning for quality control assessment of cochlear implant electrode array placement. Labadie RF; Schefano AD; Holder JT; Dwyer RT; Rivas A; O'Malley MR; Noble JH; Dawant BM Acta Otolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 140(3):206-211. PubMed ID: 31859576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Cochlear structures after implantation of a perimodiolar electrode array. Richter B; Jaekel K; Aschendorff A; Marangos N; Laszig R Laryngoscope; 2001 May; 111(5):837-43. PubMed ID: 11359162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Modiolar Proximity of Slim Modiolar Electrodes and Cochlear Duct Length: Correlation for Potential Basis of Customized Cochlear Implantation With Perimodiolar Electrodes. Lee SY; Jung Bae Y; Carandang M; Kim Y; Hee Han J; Huh G; Song JJ; Koo JW; Ho Lee J; Ha Oh S; Choi BY Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):323-333. PubMed ID: 32826506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Atraumaticity study of 2 cochlear implant electrode arrays. Manrique M; Picciafuoco S; Manrique R; Sanhueza I; Domínguez P; Pérez N; Zubieta JL; de Abajo J Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):619-28. PubMed ID: 24569795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Intraindividual comparison of psychophysical parameters between perimodiolar and lateral-type electrode arrays in patients with bilateral cochlear implants. Jeong J; Kim M; Heo JH; Bang MY; Bae MR; Kim J; Choi JY Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 25473955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants. Gordin A; Papsin B; Gordon K Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Variations in microanatomy of the human modiolus require individualized cochlear implantation. Pietsch M; Schurzig D; Salcher R; Warnecke A; Erfurt P; Lenarz T; Kral A Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):5047. PubMed ID: 35322066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Intracochlear Pressure Changes due to 2 Electrode Types: An Artificial Model Experiment. Mittmann P; Mittmann M; Ernst A; Todt I Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):712-716. PubMed ID: 28025904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Methods for evaluation of perimodiolar ci electrode arrays in human temporal bones]. Richter B; Aschendorff A; Nagursky H; Schipper J; Laszig R; Klenzner T Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Jan; 84(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 15647977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]