BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28374928)

  • 1. Evolution of virulence under intensive farming: salmon lice increase skin lesions and reduce host growth in salmon farms.
    Ugelvik MS; Skorping A; Moberg O; Mennerat A
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Jun; 30(6):1136-1142. PubMed ID: 28374928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Life history and virulence are linked in the ectoparasitic salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis.
    Mennerat A; Hamre L; Ebert D; Nilsen F; Dávidová M; Skorping A
    J Evol Biol; 2012 May; 25(5):856-61. PubMed ID: 22356541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced transcriptomic responses in the Pacific salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis oncorhynchi to the non-native Atlantic Salmon Salmo salar suggests increased parasite fitness.
    Braden LM; Sutherland BJ; Koop BF; Jones SR
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 28137252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ecology of sea lice parasitic on farmed and wild fish.
    Costello MJ
    Trends Parasitol; 2006 Oct; 22(10):475-83. PubMed ID: 16920027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Salmon lice--impact on wild salmonids and salmon aquaculture.
    Torrissen O; Jones S; Asche F; Guttormsen A; Skilbrei OT; Nilsen F; Horsberg TE; Jackson D
    J Fish Dis; 2013 Mar; 36(3):171-94. PubMed ID: 23311858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 'Snorkel' lice barrier technology reduced two co- occurring parasites, the salmon louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) and the amoebic gill disease causing agent (Neoparamoeba perurans), in commercial salmon sea-cages.
    Wright DW; Stien LH; Dempster T; Vågseth T; Nola V; Fosseidengen JE; Oppedal F
    Prev Vet Med; 2017 May; 140():97-105. PubMed ID: 28460755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Susceptibility of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, Atlantic salmon Salmo salar and coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch to experimental infection with sea lice Lepeophtheirus salmonis.
    Fast MD; Ross NW; Mustafa A; Sims DE; Johnson SC; Conboy GA; Speare DJ; Johnson G; Burka JF
    Dis Aquat Organ; 2002 Nov; 52(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 12517006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of light on the settlement of the salmon louse, Lepeophtheirus salmonis, on Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.
    Browman HI; Boxaspen K; Kuhn P
    J Fish Dis; 2004 Dec; 27(12):701-8. PubMed ID: 15575878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modelling parasite impacts of aquaculture on wild fish: The case of the salmon louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) on out-migrating wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolt.
    Moriarty M; Ives SC; Murphy JM; Murray AG
    Prev Vet Med; 2023 May; 214():105888. PubMed ID: 36906938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Invest more and die faster: The life history of a parasite on intensive farms.
    Mennerat A; Ugelvik MS; Håkonsrud Jensen C; Skorping A
    Evol Appl; 2017 Oct; 10(9):890-896. PubMed ID: 29151880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential Effects of Adult Salmon Lice Lepeophtheirus salmonis on Physiological Responses of Sockeye Salmon and Atlantic Salmon.
    Long A; Garver KA; Jones SRM
    J Aquat Anim Health; 2019 Mar; 31(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 30566268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Atlantic salmon infected with salmon lice are more susceptible to new lice infections.
    Ugelvik MS; Mo T; Mennerat A; Skorping A
    J Fish Dis; 2017 Mar; 40(3):311-317. PubMed ID: 27334700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parasite fecundity decreases with increasing parasite load in the salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis infecting Atlantic salmon Salmo salar.
    Ugelvik MS; Skorping A; Mennerat A
    J Fish Dis; 2017 May; 40(5):671-678. PubMed ID: 27594545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of regional coordination of salmon louse control in reducing negative impacts of salmonid aquaculture on wild salmonids.
    Stige LC; Jansen PA; Helgesen KO
    Int J Parasitol; 2024 Jul; 54(8-9):463-474. PubMed ID: 38609075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wild salmonids and sea louse infestations on the west coast of Scotland: sources of infection and implications for the management of marine salmon farms.
    Butler JR
    Pest Manag Sci; 2002 Jun; 58(6):595-608; discussion 622-9. PubMed ID: 12138626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stable isotopes reveal contrasting trophic dynamics between host-parasite relationships: A case study of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and parasitic lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Argulus foliaceus).
    Taccardi EY; Bricknell IR; Byron CJ
    J Fish Biol; 2020 Dec; 97(6):1821-1832. PubMed ID: 32944965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A model of salmon louse production in Norway: effects of increasing salmon production and public management measures.
    Heuch PA; Mo TA
    Dis Aquat Organ; 2001 Jun; 45(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11463102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repeated exposure affects susceptibility and responses of Atlantic salmon (
    Stølen Ugelvik M; Mennerat A; Mæhle S; Dalvin S
    Parasitology; 2023 Sep; 150(11):990-1005. PubMed ID: 37705306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Where art thou louse? A snapshot of attachment location preferences in salmon lice on Atlantic salmon hosts in sea cages.
    Bui S; Oppedal F; Nola V; Barrett LT
    J Fish Dis; 2020 Jun; 43(6):697-706. PubMed ID: 32323347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How are the salmon lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis Krøyer, 1837) in Atlantic salmon farming affected by different control efforts: A case study of an intensive production area with coordinated production cycles and changing delousing practices in 2013-2018.
    Jevne LS; Reitan KI
    J Fish Dis; 2019 Nov; 42(11):1573-1586. PubMed ID: 31506962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.