90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28375811)
1. Design of experiment for nonlinear dynamic gene regulatory network identification.
Lu T
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(3):402-412. PubMed ID: 28375811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robust variable selection method for nonparametric differential equation models with application to nonlinear dynamic gene regulatory network analysis.
Lu T
J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(4):712-24. PubMed ID: 26098537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design of long-term HIV dynamic studies using semiparametric mixed-effects models.
Huang Y; Park JG; Zhu Y
Biom J; 2008 Aug; 50(4):528-40. PubMed ID: 18615413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sparse Additive Ordinary Differential Equations for Dynamic Gene Regulatory Network Modeling.
Wu H; Lu T; Xue H; Liang H
J Am Stat Assoc; 2014 Apr; 109(506):700-716. PubMed ID: 25061254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stability analysis of genetic regulatory network with additive noises.
Jin Y; Lindsey M
BMC Genomics; 2008; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S21. PubMed ID: 18366611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stability of building gene regulatory networks with sparse autoregressive models.
Rajapakse JC; Mundra PA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011; 12 Suppl 13(Suppl 13):S17. PubMed ID: 22373004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Grouped Gene Selection of Cancer via Adaptive Sparse Group Lasso Based on Conditional Mutual Information.
Li J; Dong W; Meng D
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2018; 15(6):2028-2038. PubMed ID: 29028206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of three commonly used continuous deterministic methods for modeling gene regulation networks.
Swain MT; Mandel JJ; Dubitzky W
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Sep; 11():459. PubMed ID: 20840745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Sparse Reconstruction Approach for Identifying Gene Regulatory Networks Using Steady-State Experiment Data.
Zhang W; Zhou T
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130979. PubMed ID: 26207991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of artificial time series microarray data for dynamic gene regulatory network inference.
Xenitidis P; Seimenis I; Kakolyris S; Adamopoulos A
J Theor Biol; 2017 Aug; 426():1-16. PubMed ID: 28528256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inference of gene regulatory networks with variable time delay from time-series microarray data.
ElBakry O; Ahmad MO; Swamy MN
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(3):671-87. PubMed ID: 24091400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating sparse gene regulatory networks using a bayesian linear regression.
Sarder P; Schierding W; Cobb JP; Nehorai A
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2010 Jun; 9(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 20650703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Steady state approach to model gene regulatory networks--simulation of microarray experiments.
Rawool SB; Venkatesh KV
Biosystems; 2007; 90(3):636-55. PubMed ID: 17382459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated Identification of Core Regulatory Genes in Human Gene Regulatory Networks.
Narang V; Ramli MA; Singhal A; Kumar P; de Libero G; Poidinger M; Monterola C
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015; 11(9):e1004504. PubMed ID: 26393364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inferring gene regulatory networks via nonlinear state-space models and exploiting sparsity.
Noor A; Serpedin E; Nounou M; Nounou HN
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(4):1203-11. PubMed ID: 22350207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal design of gene knockout experiments for gene regulatory network inference.
Ud-Dean SM; Gunawan R
Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 32(6):875-83. PubMed ID: 26568633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporal transcriptional logic of dynamic regulatory networks underlying nitrogen signaling and use in plants.
Varala K; Marshall-Colón A; Cirrone J; Brooks MD; Pasquino AV; Léran S; Mittal S; Rock TM; Edwards MB; Kim GJ; Ruffel S; McCombie WR; Shasha D; Coruzzi GM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jun; 115(25):6494-6499. PubMed ID: 29769331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Applying attractor dynamics to infer gene regulatory interactions involved in cellular differentiation.
Ghaffarizadeh A; Podgorski GJ; Flann NS
Biosystems; 2017 May; 155():29-41. PubMed ID: 28254369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Bi-Objective RNN Model to Reconstruct Gene Regulatory Network: A Modified Multi-Objective Simulated Annealing Approach.
Biswas S; Acharyya S
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2018; 15(6):2053-2059. PubMed ID: 29990170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hierarchical Probabilistic Interaction Modeling for Multiple Gene Expression Replicates.
Patton KL; John DJ; Norris JL; Lewis DR; Muday GK
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2014; 11(2):336-46. PubMed ID: 26355781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
