189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28376138)
1. Numerical and Experimental Investigation on Water-Me
Yang Y; Zhou XL; Zhou NF; Shao WQ; Tao LR
Cryo Letters; 2017; 38(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 28376138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Controlled loading of cryoprotectants (CPAs) to oocyte with linear and complex CPA profiles on a microfluidic platform.
Heo YS; Lee HJ; Hassell BA; Irimia D; Toth TL; Elmoazzen H; Toner M
Lab Chip; 2011 Oct; 11(20):3530-7. PubMed ID: 21887438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microfluidic method reduces osmotic stress injury to oocytes during cryoprotectant addition and removal processes in porcine oocytes.
Guo Y; Yang Y; Yi X; Zhou X
Cryobiology; 2019 Oct; 90():63-70. PubMed ID: 31449779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mathematically optimized cryoprotectant equilibration procedures for cryopreservation of human oocytes.
Davidson AF; Benson JD; Higgins AZ
Theor Biol Med Model; 2014 Mar; 11():13. PubMed ID: 24649826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An integrated microfluidic device for single cell trapping and osmotic behavior investigation of mouse oocytes.
Guo X; Chen Z; Memon K; Chen X; Zhao G
Cryobiology; 2020 Feb; 92():267-271. PubMed ID: 31585113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Slow and steady cell shrinkage reduces osmotic stress in bovine and murine oocyte and zygote vitrification.
Lai D; Ding J; Smith GW; Smith GD; Takayama S
Hum Reprod; 2015 Jan; 30(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 25355589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Loading equine oocytes with cryoprotective agents captured with a finite element method model.
Içli S; Soleimani M; Oldenhof H; Sieme H; Wriggers P; Wolkers WF
Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):19812. PubMed ID: 34615933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Low-cost Easy-to-Fabricate Sandwich-Structured Microdevice for Controllable Removal of Extracellular Cryoprotective Agents with High Efficiency.
Memon K; Cheng Y; Panhwar F; Chen ZR; Haider Z; Afridi S; Hu P; Zhao G
Cryo Letters; 2018; 39(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 29734411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bovine oocyte membrane permeability and cryosurvival: Effects of different cryoprotectants and calcium in the vitrification media.
Marques CC; Santos-Silva C; Rodrigues C; Matos JE; Moura T; Baptista MC; Horta AEM; Bessa RJB; Alves SP; Soveral G; Pereira RMLN
Cryobiology; 2018 Apr; 81():4-11. PubMed ID: 29524383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transport processes in equine oocytes and ovarian tissue during loading with cryoprotective solutions.
Lotz J; Içli S; Liu D; Caliskan S; Sieme H; Wolkers WF; Oldenhof H
Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj; 2021 Feb; 1865(2):129797. PubMed ID: 33212229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved low-CPA vitrification of mouse oocytes using quartz microcapillary.
Choi JK; Huang H; He X
Cryobiology; 2015 Jun; 70(3):269-72. PubMed ID: 25869750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative investigations on the effects of exposure durations to the combined cryoprotective agents on mouse oocyte vitrification procedures.
Wang L; Liu J; Zhou GB; Hou YP; Li JJ; Zhu SE
Biol Reprod; 2011 Nov; 85(5):884-94. PubMed ID: 21697515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of cryoprotectant concentration on bovine oocyte permeability and comparison of two membrane permeability modelling approaches.
García-Martínez T; Mogas T; Mullen SF; Martínez-Rodero I; Gulieva RE; Higgins AZ
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):15387. PubMed ID: 34321576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Appendix C: Automated Vitrification of Mammalian Embryos on a Digital Microfluidic Device.
Liu J; Pyne DG; Abdelgawad M; Sun Y
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1568():309-316. PubMed ID: 28421507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Design and Optimization of Microfluidic Chips Used for Mixing Cryoprotectants].
Zhou X; Yi X; Zhou N; Yang Y
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 33(3):461-5. PubMed ID: 29709144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of an Open Microfluidic Platform for Oocyte One-Stop Vitrification with Cryotop Method.
Miao S; Guo C; Jiang Z; Wei HX; Jiang X; Gu J; Hai Z; Wang T; Liu YH
Biosensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 36140151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimising vitrification of human oocytes using multiple cryoprotectants and morphological and functional assessment.
Seet VY; Al-Samerria S; Wong J; Stanger J; Yovich JL; Almahbobi G
Reprod Fertil Dev; 2013; 25(6):918-26. PubMed ID: 22967503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Forced-convective vitrification with liquid cryogens.
Lyu SR; Huang JH; Shih WH; Chen YJ; Hsieh WH
Cryobiology; 2013 Jun; 66(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 23545291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of cryoprotectant addition and washout methods on the viability of precision-cut liver slices.
Guan N; Blomsma SA; van Midwoud PM; Fahy GM; Groothuis GM; de Graaf IA
Cryobiology; 2012 Dec; 65(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 22722061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of membrane transport models to design cryopreservation procedures for oocytes.
Caliskan S; Liu D; Oldenhof H; Sieme H; Wolkers WF
Anim Reprod Sci; 2024 Jun; 267():107536. PubMed ID: 38908169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
