These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28376148)

  • 1. Adaptive Clinical Trials: Advantages and Disadvantages of Various Adaptive Design Elements.
    Korn EL; Freidlin B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Jun; 109(6):. PubMed ID: 28376148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changing platforms without stopping the train: experiences of data management and data management systems when adapting platform protocols by adding and closing comparisons.
    Hague D; Townsend S; Masters L; Rauchenberger M; Van Looy N; Diaz-Montana C; Gannon M; James N; Maughan T; Parmar MKB; Brown L; Sydes MR;
    Trials; 2019 May; 20(1):294. PubMed ID: 31138292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New clinical trial designs in the era of precision medicine: An overview of definitions, strengths, weaknesses, and current use in oncology.
    Janiaud P; Serghiou S; Ioannidis JPA
    Cancer Treat Rev; 2019 Feb; 73():20-30. PubMed ID: 30572165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.
    Green AK; Reeder-Hayes KE; Corty RW; Basch E; Milowsky MI; Dusetzina SB; Bennett AV; Wood WA
    Oncologist; 2015 May; 20(5):464-e20. PubMed ID: 25876994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A modified varying-stage adaptive phase II/III clinical trial design.
    Dong G; Vandemeulebroecke M
    Pharm Stat; 2016 Jul; 15(4):368-78. PubMed ID: 27264007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practical characteristics of adaptive design in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials.
    Sato A; Shimura M; Gosho M
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2018 Apr; 43(2):170-180. PubMed ID: 28850685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hyperbaric oxygen brain injury treatment (HOBIT) trial: a multifactor design with response adaptive randomization and longitudinal modeling.
    Gajewski BJ; Berry SM; Barsan WG; Silbergleit R; Meurer WJ; Martin R; Rockswold GL
    Pharm Stat; 2016 Sep; 15(5):396-404. PubMed ID: 27306921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simulation study of outcome adaptive randomization in multi-arm clinical trials.
    Wathen JK; Thall PF
    Clin Trials; 2017 Oct; 14(5):432-440. PubMed ID: 28982263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical inference for response adaptive randomization procedures with adjusted optimal allocation proportions.
    Zhu H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(5):732-740. PubMed ID: 27937121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A literature review of applied adaptive design methodology within the field of oncology in randomised controlled trials and a proposed extension to the CONSORT guidelines.
    Mistry P; Dunn JA; Marshall A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):108. PubMed ID: 28720094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response adaptive randomization procedures in seamless phase II/III clinical trials.
    Zhu H; Piao J; Lee JJ; Hu F; Zhang L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2020; 30(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 31454295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advantages of multi-arm non-randomised sequentially allocated cohort designs for Phase II oncology trials.
    Mossop H; Grayling MJ; Gallagher FA; Welsh SJ; Stewart GD; Wason JMS
    Br J Cancer; 2022 Feb; 126(2):204-210. PubMed ID: 34750494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian adaptive randomized trial design for patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
    Trippa L; Lee EQ; Wen PY; Batchelor TT; Cloughesy T; Parmigiani G; Alexander BM
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Sep; 30(26):3258-63. PubMed ID: 22649140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of Bayesian hierarchical models for adaptive randomization in biomarker-driven phase II studies.
    Barry WT; Perou CM; Marcom PK; Carey LA; Ibrahim JG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(1):66-88. PubMed ID: 24836519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A varying-stage adaptive phase II/III clinical trial design.
    Dong G
    Stat Med; 2014 Apr; 33(8):1272-87. PubMed ID: 24273128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized phase II designs in cancer clinical trials: current status and future directions.
    Lee JJ; Feng L
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Jul; 23(19):4450-7. PubMed ID: 15994154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive Design: A Review of the Technical, Statistical, and Regulatory Aspects of Implementation in a Clinical Trial.
    Cerqueira FP; Jesus AMC; Cotrim MD
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2020 Jan; 54(1):246-258. PubMed ID: 32008232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Review of Perspectives on the Use of Randomization in Phase II Oncology Trials.
    Grayling MJ; Dimairo M; Mander AP; Jaki TF
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2019 Dec; 111(12):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 31218346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adding experimental arms to platform clinical trials: randomization procedures and interim analyses.
    Ventz S; Cellamare M; Parmigiani G; Trippa L
    Biostatistics; 2018 Apr; 19(2):199-215. PubMed ID: 29036330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An overview of the design and conduct of the BATTLE trials.
    Liu S; Lee JJ
    Chin Clin Oncol; 2015 Sep; 4(3):33. PubMed ID: 26408300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.