3524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28376281)
21. Intensity ratio curve analysis of small renal masses on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Moriyama S; Yoshida S; Tanaka H; Tanaka H; Yokoyama M; Ishioka J; Matsuoka Y; Saito K; Kihara K; Fujii Y
Int J Urol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):554-560. PubMed ID: 29577440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prediction of Benign and Malignant Solid Renal Masses: Machine Learning-Based CT Texture Analysis.
Erdim C; Yardimci AH; Bektas CT; Kocak B; Koca SB; Demir H; Kilickesmez O
Acad Radiol; 2020 Oct; 27(10):1422-1429. PubMed ID: 32014404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Texture analysis as a radiomic marker for differentiating renal tumors.
Yu H; Scalera J; Khalid M; Touret AS; Bloch N; Li B; Qureshi MM; Soto JA; Anderson SW
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Oct; 42(10):2470-2478. PubMed ID: 28421244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Comprehensive Computer-Assisted Diagnosis System for Early Assessment of Renal Cancer Tumors.
Shehata M; Alksas A; Abouelkheir RT; Elmahdy A; Shaffie A; Soliman A; Ghazal M; Abu Khalifeh H; Salim R; Abdel Razek AAK; Alghamdi NS; El-Baz A
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(14):. PubMed ID: 34300667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Differentiation of Predominantly Solid Enhancing Lipid-Poor Renal Cell Masses by Use of Contrast-Enhanced CT: Evaluating the Role of Texture in Tumor Subtyping.
Varghese BA; Chen F; Hwang DH; Cen SY; Desai B; Gill IS; Duddalwar VA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):W288-W296. PubMed ID: 30240299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Automated classification of solid renal masses on contrast-enhanced computed tomography images using convolutional neural network with decision fusion.
Zabihollahy F; Schieda N; Krishna S; Ukwatta E
Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):5183-5190. PubMed ID: 32350661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Differentiating novel coronavirus pneumonia from general pneumonia based on machine learning.
Liu C; Wang X; Liu C; Sun Q; Peng W
Biomed Eng Online; 2020 Aug; 19(1):66. PubMed ID: 32814568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effective staging of fibrosis by the selected texture features of liver: Which one is better, CT or MR imaging?
Zhang X; Gao X; Liu BJ; Ma K; Yan W; Liling L; Yuhong H; Fujita H
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():227-36. PubMed ID: 26455963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fat poor angiomyolipoma differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at 320-slice dynamic volume CT perfusion.
Chen C; Kang Q; Xu B; Shi Z; Guo H; Wei Q; Lu Y; Wu X
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 May; 43(5):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 28828638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat from homogeneous clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Nie P; Yang G; Wang Z; Yan L; Miao W; Hao D; Wu J; Zhao Y; Gong A; Cui J; Jia Y; Niu H
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1274-1284. PubMed ID: 31506816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High-frame-rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound to differentiate between clear cell renal cell carcinoma and angiomyolipoma.
Wang J; Shi J; Gao L; Hu W; Chen M; Zhang W
BMC Cancer; 2024 May; 24(1):659. PubMed ID: 38816725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Texture analysis and machine learning algorithms accurately predict histologic grade in small (< 4 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinomas: a pilot study.
Haji-Momenian S; Lin Z; Patel B; Law N; Michalak A; Nayak A; Earls J; Loew M
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Mar; 45(3):789-798. PubMed ID: 31822969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Does Computer-Aided Diagnosis Permit Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma on MDCT?
Lee Y; Kim JK; Shim W; Sung YS; Cho KS; Shin JH; Kim MH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):W305-12. PubMed ID: 26295666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted imaging models: Quantitative biomarkers for differentiating renal clear cell carcinoma and minimal fat angiomyolipoma.
Li H; Liang L; Li A; Hu Y; Hu D; Li Z; Kamel IR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 46(1):240-247. PubMed ID: 27859853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Review of Value of CT Texture Analysis and Machine Learning in Differentiating Fat-Poor Renal Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Zhang Y; Li X; Lv Y; Gu X
Tomography; 2020 Dec; 6(4):325-332. PubMed ID: 33364422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Subjective and objective heterogeneity scores for differentiating small renal masses using contrast-enhanced CT.
Leng S; Takahashi N; Gomez Cardona D; Kitajima K; McCollough B; Li Z; Kawashima A; Leibovich BC; McCollough CH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 May; 42(5):1485-1492. PubMed ID: 28025654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Kim JY; Kim JK; Kim N; Cho KS
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):472-9. PubMed ID: 18094264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat?
Catalano OA; Samir AE; Sahani DV; Hahn PF
Radiology; 2008 Jun; 247(3):738-46. PubMed ID: 18413886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic value of texture analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps for differentiating fat-poor angiomyolipoma from non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.
Arita Y; Yoshida S; Kwee TC; Akita H; Okuda S; Iwaita Y; Mukai K; Matsumoto S; Ueda R; Ishii R; Mizuno R; Fujii Y; Oya M; Jinzaki M
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Oct; 143():109895. PubMed ID: 34388418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiation of renal cell carcinoma subtypes and angiomyolipoma.
Li CX; Lu Q; Huang BJ; Xue LY; Yan LX; Zheng FY; Wen JX; Wang WP
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):795-802. PubMed ID: 26971426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
