These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Undeserved reward but not inevitable loss biases attention: Personal control moderates evaluative attentional biases in the additional-singleton paradigm. Müller P; Wentura D Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Apr; 76(4):888-904. PubMed ID: 35466816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence for attentional capture by a surprising color singleton in visual search. Horstmann G Psychol Sci; 2002 Nov; 13(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 12430832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bringing color to emotion: The influence of color on attentional bias to briefly presented emotional images. Bekhtereva V; Müller MM Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 17(5):1028-1047. PubMed ID: 28699142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Top-down search strategies determine attentional capture in visual search: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Eimer M; Kiss M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):951-62. PubMed ID: 20436192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Brain structures involved in visual search in the presence and absence of color singletons. Talsma D; Coe B; Munoz DP; Theeuwes J J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):761-74. PubMed ID: 19309291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Playing TETRIS for science counter-regulatory affective processing in a motivationally "hot" context. Wentura D; Voss A; Rothermund K Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 19555920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Altering attentional control settings causes persistent biases of visual attention. Knight HC; Smith DT; Knight DC; Ellison A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):129-49. PubMed ID: 25801329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Involuntary sensory enhancement of gain- and loss-associated tones: A general relevance principle. Folyi T; Wentura D Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Apr; 138():11-26. PubMed ID: 30685230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A category-specific top-down attentional set can affect the neural responses outside the current focus of attention. Jiang Y; Wu X; Gao X Neurosci Lett; 2017 Oct; 659():80-85. PubMed ID: 28735084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incongruency effects in affective processing: automatic motivational counter-regulation or mismatch-induced salience? Rothermund K; Gast A; Wentura D Cogn Emot; 2011 Apr; 25(3):413-25. PubMed ID: 21432683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling. Nordfang M; Dyrholm M; Bundesen C J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 May; 142(2):510-35. PubMed ID: 22889161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]