263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28376900)
21. Automated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning for Cervical Cancer Based on Convolution Neural Network.
Jihong C; Penggang B; Xiuchun Z; Kaiqiang C; Wenjuan C; Yitao D; Jiewei Q; Kerun Q; Jing Z; Tianming W
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2020; 19():1533033820957002. PubMed ID: 33016230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Helical tomotherapy vs. intensity-modulated proton therapy for whole pelvis irradiation in high-risk prostate cancer patients: dosimetric, normal tissue complication probability, and generalized equivalent uniform dose analysis.
Widesott L; Pierelli A; Fiorino C; Lomax AJ; Amichetti M; Cozzarini C; Soukup M; Schneider R; Hug E; Di Muzio N; Calandrino R; Schwarz M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Aug; 80(5):1589-600. PubMed ID: 21167651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Risk adaptive planning with biology-based constraints may lead to higher tumor control probability in tumors of the canine brain: A planning study.
Radonic S; Schneider U; Besserer J; Meier VS; Rohrer Bley C
Phys Med; 2024 Mar; 119():103317. PubMed ID: 38430675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Auto- versus human-driven plan in mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma radiation treatment.
Clemente S; Oliviero C; Palma G; D'Avino V; Liuzzi R; Conson M; Pacelli R; Cella L
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Oct; 13(1):202. PubMed ID: 30340604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Helical tomotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma-any advantages over conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
Wu WC; Mui WL; Fung WK
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 19931024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dosimetric evaluation and clinical outcome in post-operative patients of carcinoma vulva treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Khosla D; Patel FD; Shukla AK; Rai B; Oinam AS; Sharma SC
Indian J Cancer; 2015; 52(4):670-5. PubMed ID: 26960514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Application value of reduced field intensity modulated radiation therapy for advanced cervical cancer].
DU XL; Sheng XG; Wang C; Yu H; Song QQ; Pan CX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 35(12):925-31. PubMed ID: 24506963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dosimetric advantages of a clinical daily adaptive plan selection strategy compared with a non-adaptive strategy in cervical cancer radiation therapy.
van de Schoot AJAJ; de Boer P; Visser J; Stalpers LJA; Rasch CRN; Bel A
Acta Oncol; 2017 May; 56(5):667-674. PubMed ID: 28447562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a strategy for improving therapeutic gain and reducing the integral dose.
Abate A; Pressello MC; Benassi M; Strigari L
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(23):7183-98. PubMed ID: 19920309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Detailed evaluation of an automated approach to interactive optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy plans.
Tol JP; Dahele M; Delaney AR; Doornaert P; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1818. PubMed ID: 27036579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Highly Efficient Training, Refinement, and Validation of a Knowledge-based Planning Quality-Control System for Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials.
Li N; Carmona R; Sirak I; Kasaova L; Followill D; Michalski J; Bosch W; Straube W; Mell LK; Moore KL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jan; 97(1):164-172. PubMed ID: 27979445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The use of biologically related model (Eclipse) for the intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning of nasopharyngeal carcinomas.
Kan MW; Leung LH; Yu PK
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112229. PubMed ID: 25372041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dose Prediction Models Based on Geometric and Plan Optimization Parameter for Adjuvant Radiotherapy Planning Design in Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy.
Tang H; Chen Y; Jiang J; Li K; Zeng J; Hu Z; Yin R
J Healthc Eng; 2021; 2021():7026098. PubMed ID: 34804459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Dosimetric study of postoperative 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and coplanar decile intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer].
Jiang J; Zhang L; Liao S; Huagn R
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Aug; 32(8):1201-5. PubMed ID: 22931623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Helical tomotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of dominant intraprostatic lesion: a treament planning comparison.
Fellin F; Azzeroni R; Maggio A; Lorentini S; Cozzarini C; Di Muzio N; Fiorino C; Calandrino R; Schwarz M
Radiother Oncol; 2013 May; 107(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 23541644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Benefit of using biologic parameters (EUD and NTCP) in IMRT optimization for treatment of intrahepatic tumors.
Thomas E; Chapet O; Kessler ML; Lawrence TS; Ten Haken RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 15890602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Individualized nonadaptive and online-adaptive intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment strategies for cervical cancer patients based on pretreatment acquired variable bladder filling computed tomography scans.
Bondar ML; Hoogeman MS; Mens JW; Quint S; Ahmad R; Dhawtal G; Heijmen BJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Aug; 83(5):1617-23. PubMed ID: 22270164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans.
Yuan L; Ge Y; Lee WR; Yin FF; Kirkpatrick JP; Wu QJ
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6868-78. PubMed ID: 23127079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
