These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1028 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28377160)

  • 1. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal attention is involved in the enhancement of attentional capture with task difficulty: an event-related brain potential study.
    Sugimoto F; Kimura M; Takeda Y; Katayama J
    Neuroreport; 2017 Aug; 28(12):755-759. PubMed ID: 28682830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture by regulating attentional focus.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 18510441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. P3a from visual stimuli: task difficulty effects.
    Hagen GF; Gatherwright JR; Lopez BA; Polich J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 16253363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 117(11):2532-9. PubMed ID: 17005448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distractor P3 is associated with attentional capture by stimulus deviance.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 119(6):1300-9. PubMed ID: 18411071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus complexity effects on the event-related potentials to task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Barkaszi I; Czigler I; Balázs L
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 23702457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance-dependent reward hurts performance: The non-monotonic attentional load modulation on task-irrelevant distractor processing.
    He X; Liu W; Qin N; Lyu L; Dong X; Bao M
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Dec; 58(12):e13920. PubMed ID: 34383329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli.
    Comerchero MD; Polich J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Jan; 110(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 10348317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. P3a from a passive visual stimulus task.
    Jeon YW; Polich J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Dec; 112(12):2202-8. PubMed ID: 11738190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
    Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. P3a from visual stimuli: typicality, task, and topography.
    Polich J; Comerchero MD
    Brain Topogr; 2003; 15(3):141-52. PubMed ID: 12705810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.
    Frings C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():113-22. PubMed ID: 20674555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task difficulty modulates brain activation in the emotional oddball task.
    Siciliano RE; Madden DJ; Tallman CW; Boylan MA; Kirste I; Monge ZA; Packard LE; Potter GG; Wang L
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():74-86. PubMed ID: 28377158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Momentary fluctuations in allocation of attention: cross-modal effects of visual task load on auditory discrimination.
    Haroush K; Hochstein S; Deouell LY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jul; 22(7):1440-51. PubMed ID: 19580389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A crossmodal crossover: opposite effects of visual and auditory perceptual load on steady-state evoked potentials to irrelevant visual stimuli.
    Jacoby O; Hall SE; Mattingley JB
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(4):1050-8. PubMed ID: 22465299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture for deviant information.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    Psychophysiology; 2007 May; 44(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 17433096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 52.