These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28377854)
1. Paired Comparison Survey Analyses Utilizing Rasch Methodology of the Relative Difficulty and Estimated Work Relative Value Units of CPT Lorio M; Martinson M; Ferrara L Int J Spine Surg; 2016; 10():40. PubMed ID: 28377854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative Analysis of Learning Curve, Complexity, Psychological Stress, and Work Relative Value Units for CPT 62380 Endoscopic Lumbar Spinal Decompression vs Traditional Lumbar Spine Surgeries: A Paired Rasch Survey Study. Lewandrowski KU; Alfaro Pachicano HH; Alvim Fiorelli RK; Elfar JC; Landgraeber S; Oertel J; Hellinger S; Dowling Á; De Carvalho PST; Ramos MRF; Defino H; Bergamaschi JP; Houle P; Montemurro N; Yeung C; Brito M; Beall DP; Ivanic G; Xifeng Z; Li ZZ; Kim HS; Kim JL; Lorio MP Int J Spine Surg; 2024 May; 18(2):138-151. PubMed ID: 38677780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of Work Relative Value Units for Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis by Open Decompression and Interlaminar Stabilization. Lorio D; Twetten M; Golish SR; Lorio MP Int J Spine Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 33900951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paired Comparison Survey Analysis Utilizing Rasch Methodology of the Relative Difficulty and Estimated Work Relative Value Units of CPT Code 0202T. Lorio M; Lewandrowski KU; Yeager MT; Hallas K; Kube R; Yue J Int J Spine Surg; 2024 May; 18(2):130-137. PubMed ID: 38471742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of Work Related to Endoscopic Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Lewandrowski KU; Lorio MP J Pers Med; 2023 Mar; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 37109000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Association of Neurosurgical Work Relative Value Units with Objective Markers of Operative Complexity. Chiu RG; Siddiqui N; Nunna RS; Patel S; Rosinski CL; Chaker AN; Hobbs JG; Mehta AI World Neurosurg; 2021 Feb; 146():e194-e204. PubMed ID: 33091644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How Much Work Effort is Involved in Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion? Garber T; Ledonio CG; Polly DW Int J Spine Surg; 2015; 9():58. PubMed ID: 26609513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Work Relative Value Units Do Not Adequately Support the Burden of Infection Management in Revision Knee Arthroplasty. Samuel LT; Grits D; Acuña AJ; Piuzzi NS; Higuera-Rueda CA; Kamath AF J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Feb; 102(3):230-236. PubMed ID: 31609889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion in Surgeon Population of ISASS and SMISS Membership. Lorio MP; Polly DW; Ninkovic I; Ledonio CG; Hallas K; Andersson G Open Orthop J; 2014; 8():1-6. PubMed ID: 24551025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Work intensity in sacroiliac joint fusion and lumbar microdiscectomy. Frank C; Kondrashov D; Meyer SC; Dix G; Lorio M; Kovalsky D; Cher D Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2016; 8():367-76. PubMed ID: 27555790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of a Posterior versus Anterior Approach for Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Based on Relative Value Units. Sodhi N; Patel Y; Berger RJ; Newman JM; Anis HK; Ehiorobo JO; Khlopas A; Desai R; Hollern DA; Schwartz JM; Paulino CB; Mont MA Surg Technol Int; 2019 Nov; 35():363-368. PubMed ID: 31373381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What provides a better value for your time? The use of relative value units to compare posterior segmental instrumentation of vertebral segments. Orr RD; Sodhi N; Dalton SE; Khlopas A; Sultan AA; Chughtai M; Newman JM; Savage J; Mroz TE; Mont MA Spine J; 2018 Oct; 18(10):1727-1732. PubMed ID: 29410308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Underrepresentation of pediatric operations in the relative value unit updating process. Massoumi RL; Childers CP; Lee SL J Pediatr Surg; 2021 Jun; 56(6):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 33743987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 2015 Medicare relative value units for gender-specific procedures: Gynecologic and gynecologic-oncologic versus urologic CPT coding. Has time healed gender-worth? Benoit MF; Ma JF; Upperman BA Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Feb; 144(2):336-342. PubMed ID: 28024653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of Relative Value Units With Surgical Complexity and Physician Workload in Urology. Gan ZS; Wood CM; Hayon S; Deal A; Smith AB; Tan HJ; Pruthi RS Urology; 2020 May; 139():71-77. PubMed ID: 32084413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vascular surgery and the Resource-based Relative Value Scale five-year review. Zwolak RM; Trout HH J Vasc Surg; 1997 Jun; 25(6):1077-86. PubMed ID: 9201169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How Is Physician Work Valued? Jacobs JP; Lahey SJ; Nichols FC; Levett JM; Johnston GG; Freeman RK; St Louis JD; Painter J; Yohe C; Wright CD; Kanter KR; Mayer JE; Naunheim KS; Rich JB; Bavaria JE; Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Feb; 103(2):373-380. PubMed ID: 28109347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. National Undervaluation of Cleft Surgical Services: Evidence from a Comparative Analysis of 50,450 Cases. Rochlin DH; Chaya BF; Flores RL Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Mar; 151(3):603-610. PubMed ID: 36730532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reimbursement for Hip Fractures: The Impact of Varied Current Procedural Terminology Coding Using Relative Value Units. Beck CM; Blair SE; Nana AD J Arthroplasty; 2020 Dec; 35(12):3464-3466. PubMed ID: 32741709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association of Work Measures and Specialty With Assigned Work Relative Value Units Among Surgeons. Childers CP; Dworsky JQ; Russell MM; Maggard-Gibbons M JAMA Surg; 2019 Oct; 154(10):915-921. PubMed ID: 31314063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]