224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28378073)
1. Kinematics of cervical segments C5/C6 in axial rotation before and after total disc arthroplasty.
Wachowski MM; Weiland J; Wagner M; Gezzi R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Nägerl H
Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2425-2433. PubMed ID: 28378073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does total disc arthroplasty in C3/C4-segments change the kinematic features of axial rotation?
Wachowski MM; Wagner M; Weiland J; Dörner J; Raab BW; Dathe H; Gezzi R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Nägerl H
J Biomech; 2013 Jun; 46(10):1739-45. PubMed ID: 23659912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total disc arthroplasties alter the characteristics of the instantaneous helical axis of the cervical functional spinal units C3/C4 and C5/C6 during flexion and extension in in vitro conditions.
Roch PJ; Wagner M; Weiland J; Spiering S; Lehmann W; Saul D; Weiser L; Viezens L; Wachowski MM
J Biomech; 2020 Feb; 100():109608. PubMed ID: 31926589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total disc arthroplasties change the kinematics of functional spinal units during lateral bending.
Roch PJ; Wagner M; Weiland J; Gezzi R; Spiering S; Lehmann W; Saul D; Weiser L; Viezens L; Wachowski MM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Mar; 73():130-139. PubMed ID: 31982810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motion response of a polycrystalline diamond adaptive axis of rotation cervical total disc arthroplasty.
Havey RM; Khayatzadeh S; Voronov LI; Blank KR; Carandang G; Harding DP; Patwardhan AG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Feb; 62():34-41. PubMed ID: 30665037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How do spinal segments move?
Wachowski MM; Mansour M; Lee C; Ackenhausen A; Spiering S; Fanghänel J; Dumont C; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Nägerl H
J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2286-93. PubMed ID: 19682692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical consideration of prosthesis selection in hybrid surgery for bi-level cervical disc degenerative diseases.
Mo Z; Li Q; Jia Z; Yang J; Wong DW; Fan Y
Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):1181-1190. PubMed ID: 27652678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite Element Analysis of Influence of Axial Position of Center of Rotation of a Cervical Total Disc Replacement on Biomechanical Parameters: Simulated 2-Level Replacement Based on a Validated Model.
Li Y; Zhang Z; Liao Z; Mo Z; Liu W
World Neurosurg; 2017 Oct; 106():932-938. PubMed ID: 28736356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
Park JJ; Quirno M; Cunningham MR; Schwarzkopf R; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and Prestige LP disc.
Kowalczyk I; Lazaro BC; Fink M; Rabin D; Duggal N
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Dec; 15(6):630-5. PubMed ID: 21905776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc.
Lazaro BC; Yucesoy K; Yuksel KZ; Kowalczyk I; Rabin D; Fink M; Duggal N
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E6. PubMed ID: 20568921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of a metal-on-metal cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis.
Colle KO; Butler JB; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Theodore N; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):1640-9. PubMed ID: 24094992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc.
Pickett GE; Rouleau JP; Duggal N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Sep; 30(17):1949-54. PubMed ID: 16135984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new cervical artificial disc prosthesis based on physiological curvature of end plate: a finite element analysis.
Yu CC; Liu P; Huang DG; Jiang YH; Feng H; Hao DJ
Spine J; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1384-1391. PubMed ID: 27345748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of cervical total disc replacement on motion in the target and adjacent segments.
Vogt M; Mehren C; Hackenbroch C; Wilke HJ
Spine J; 2024 Jul; 24(7):1313-1322. PubMed ID: 38301903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of cervical posterior foraminotomy on segmental range of motion in the setting of total disc arthroplasty.
Bevevino AJ; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Gwinn DE; Dmitriev AE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):1572-7. PubMed ID: 24921846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional motion analysis of the cervical spine for comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus artificial disc replacement in 17 patients: clinical article.
McDonald CP; Chang V; McDonald M; Ramo N; Bey MJ; Bartol S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Mar; 20(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 24359000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
