These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28378073)
61. Cervical Disk Replacement Combined With Cage Fusion for the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Disk Herniation. Ren X; Chu T; Jiang T; Wang W; Wang J; Li C; Zhang Z Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Jul; 29(6):218-25. PubMed ID: 22832555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. In vivo analysis of cervical kinematics after implantation of a minimally constrained cervical artificial disc replacement. Koller H; Meier O; Zenner J; Mayer M; Hitzl W Eur Spine J; 2013 Apr; 22(4):747-58. PubMed ID: 23179982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Subaxial Cervical Intradiscal Pressure and Segmental Kinematics Following Atlantoaxial Fixation in Different Angles. Liu Q; Guo Q; Yang J; Zhang P; Xu T; Cheng X; Chen J; Guan H; Ni B World Neurosurg; 2016 Mar; 87():521-8. PubMed ID: 26409072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Migration of the instantaneous axis of motion during axial rotation in lumbar segments and role of the zygapophysial joints. Wachowski MM; Hawellek T; Hubert J; Lehmann A; Mansour M; Dumont C; Dörner J; Raab BW; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Nägerl H Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2010; 12(4):39-47. PubMed ID: 21361255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Analysis of factors that may influence range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty. Kim SW; Paik SH; Castro PA; Baek SW; Shin DJ; Kwak YH; Ju YS Spine J; 2010 Aug; 10(8):683-8. PubMed ID: 20537960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Kinematic assessment of an elastic-core cervical disc prosthesis in one and two-level constructs. Guyer RD; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Khayatzadeh S; Carandang G; Blank KR; Werner S; Rubin J; Padovani N; Patwardhan AG JOR Spine; 2018 Dec; 1(4):e1040. PubMed ID: 31463455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease--clinical results and functional outcome at two years in patients implanted with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Heidecke V; Burkert W; Brucke M; Rainov NG Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2008 May; 150(5):453-9; discussion 459. PubMed ID: 18421412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement. Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. In vivo three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine during seated axial rotation and lateral bending via a fluoroscopy-to-CT registration approach. Lin CC; Lu TW; Wang TM; Hsu CY; Hsu SJ; Shih TF J Biomech; 2014 Oct; 47(13):3310-7. PubMed ID: 25218506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Changes in cervical range of motion and sagittal alignment in early and late phases after total disc replacement: radiographic follow-up exceeding 2 years. Ahn PG; Kim KN; Moon SW; Kim KS J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):688-95. PubMed ID: 19951021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. Chang UK; Kim DH; Lee MC; Willenberg R; Kim SH; Lim J J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Jul; 7(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17633485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of the cervical spine during maximal axial rotation. Salem W; Lenders C; Mathieu J; Hermanus N; Klein P Man Ther; 2013 Aug; 18(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 23375147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Biomechanical analysis of single- and double-level cervical disc arthroplasty using finite element modeling. Rahman WU; Jiang W; Zhao F; Li Z; Wang G; Yang G Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2023 Jan; 237(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 36394294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Effect of intervertebral disc height on the range of motion and clinical outcomes after single-level implantation of Prestige LP cervical disc prosthesis. Li H; Lou J; Liu H; Wang B Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Sep; 148():1-4. PubMed ID: 27348742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. An in vivo comparison study in goats for a novel motion-preserving cervical joint system. Qin J; Zhao C; Wang D; Zhao B; Dong J; Li H; Sang R; Wang S; Fu J; Kong R; He X PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178775. PubMed ID: 28582418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Six-degrees-of-freedom cervical spine range of motion during dynamic flexion-extension after single-level anterior arthrodesis: comparison with asymptomatic control subjects. Anderst WJ; Lee JY; Donaldson WF; Kang JD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 23515984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Kretzer RM; Hsu W; Hu N; Umekoji H; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E778-85. PubMed ID: 22228326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Dimensional changes of the neuroforamina in subaxial cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension. Mao H; Driscoll SJ; Li JS; Li G; Wood KB; Cha TD Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 26681352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]