These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28380012)

  • 1. Finishing pigs that are divergent in feed efficiency show small differences in intestinal functionality and structure.
    Metzler-Zebeli BU; Lawlor PG; Magowan E; McCormack UM; Curião T; Hollmann M; Ertl R; Aschenbach JR; Zebeli Q
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0174917. PubMed ID: 28380012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in intestinal size, structure, and function contributing to feed efficiency in broiler chickens reared at geographically distant locations.
    Metzler-Zebeli BU; Magowan E; Hollmann M; Ball MEE; Molnár A; Witter K; Ertl R; Hawken RJ; Lawlor PG; O'Connell NE; Aschenbach J; Zebeli Q
    Poult Sci; 2018 Feb; 97(2):578-591. PubMed ID: 29253222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring a Possible Link between the Intestinal Microbiota and Feed Efficiency in Pigs.
    McCormack UM; Curião T; Buzoianu SG; Prieto ML; Ryan T; Varley P; Crispie F; Magowan E; Metzler-Zebeli BU; Berry D; O'Sullivan O; Cotter PD; Gardiner GE; Lawlor PG
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Aug; 83(15):. PubMed ID: 28526795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pigs that are divergent in feed efficiency, differ in intestinal enzyme and nutrient transporter gene expression, nutrient digestibility and microbial activity.
    Vigors S; Sweeney T; O'Shea CJ; Kelly AK; O'Doherty JV
    Animal; 2016 Nov; 10(11):1848-1855. PubMed ID: 27173889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Porcine Feed Efficiency-Associated Intestinal Microbiota and Physiological Traits: Finding Consistent Cross-Locational Biomarkers for Residual Feed Intake.
    McCormack UM; Curião T; Metzler-Zebeli BU; Magowan E; Berry DP; Reyer H; Prieto ML; Buzoianu SG; Harrison M; Rebeiz N; Crispie F; Cotter PD; O'Sullivan O; Gardiner GE; Lawlor PG
    mSystems; 2019 Jun; 4(4):. PubMed ID: 31213524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interactions between metabolically active bacteria and host gene expression at the cecal mucosa in pigs of diverging feed efficiency.
    Metzler-Zebeli BU; Lawlor PG; Magowan E; Zebeli Q
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 96(6):2249-2264. PubMed ID: 29746643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Difference in short-term responses to a high-fiber diet in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
    Montagne L; Loisel F; Le Naou T; Gondret F; Gilbert H; Le Gall M
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Apr; 92(4):1512-23. PubMed ID: 24496835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feed Restriction Modifies Intestinal Microbiota-Host Mucosal Networking in Chickens Divergent in Residual Feed Intake.
    Metzler-Zebeli BU; Siegerstetter SC; Magowan E; Lawlor PG; Petri RM; O Connell NE; Zebeli Q
    mSystems; 2019; 4(1):. PubMed ID: 30701192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of potential serum biomarkers to predict feed efficiency in young pigs.
    Grubbs JK; Dekkers JC; Huff-Lonergan E; Tuggle CK; Lonergan SM
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Apr; 94(4):1482-92. PubMed ID: 27136007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased expressions of genes and proteins involved in mitochondrial oxidation and antioxidant pathway in adipose tissue of pigs selected for a low residual feed intake.
    Louveau I; Vincent A; Tacher S; Gilbert H; Gondret F
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Dec; 94(12):5042-5054. PubMed ID: 28046150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Post-weaning blood transcriptomic differences between Yorkshire pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
    Liu H; Nguyen YT; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC; Tuggle CK
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():73. PubMed ID: 26801403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review: divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig.
    Gilbert H; Billon Y; Brossard L; Faure J; Gatellier P; Gondret F; Labussière E; Lebret B; Lefaucheur L; Le Floch N; Louveau I; Merlot E; Meunier-Salaün MC; Montagne L; Mormede P; Renaudeau D; Riquet J; Rogel-Gaillard C; van Milgen J; Vincent A; Noblet J
    Animal; 2017 Sep; 11(9):1427-1439. PubMed ID: 28118862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Energy utilization in pigs selected for high and low residual feed intake.
    Barea R; Dubois S; Gilbert H; Sellier P; van Milgen J; Noblet J
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jun; 88(6):2062-72. PubMed ID: 20154162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of Divergence in Feed Efficiency on the Intestinal Microbiota and the Intestinal Immune Response in Both Unchallenged and Lipopolysaccharide Challenged Ileal and Colonic Explants.
    Vigors S; O'Doherty JV; Kelly AK; O'Shea CJ; Sweeney T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148145. PubMed ID: 26840831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fecal Microbiota Transplant From Highly Feed Efficient Donors Affects Cecal Physiology and Microbiota in Low- and High-Feed Efficient Chickens.
    Metzler-Zebeli BU; Siegerstetter SC; Magowan E; Lawlor PG; O Connell NE; Zebeli Q
    Front Microbiol; 2019; 10():1576. PubMed ID: 31354670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A transcriptome multi-tissue analysis identifies biological pathways and genes associated with variations in feed efficiency of growing pigs.
    Gondret F; Vincent A; Houée-Bigot M; Siegel A; Lagarrigue S; Causeur D; Gilbert H; Louveau I
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):244. PubMed ID: 28327084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of immune system stimulation and divergent selection for residual feed intake on digestive capacity of the small intestine in growing pigs.
    Rakhshandeh A; Dekkers JC; Kerr BJ; Weber TE; English J; Gabler NK
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90 Suppl 4():233-5. PubMed ID: 23365340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved nutrient digestibility and retention partially explains feed efficiency gains in pigs selected for low residual feed intake.
    Harris AJ; Patience JF; Lonergan SM; J M Dekkers C; Gabler NK
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90 Suppl 4():164-6. PubMed ID: 23365317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing peripheral blood cell profile of Yorkshire pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
    Mpetile Z; Young JM; Gabler NK; Dekkers JC; Tuggle CK
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Mar; 93(3):892-9. PubMed ID: 26020867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of dietary supplementation of low crude protein on intestinal morphology in pigs.
    Li Y; Lu X; Wu H; Xia M; Hou Q; Hu W; Li T; Wu L; Yu Q
    Res Vet Sci; 2019 Feb; 122():15-21. PubMed ID: 30447500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.