124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28380400)
1. Key individuals for discerning pedigrees belonging to the same autosomal kinship class.
Gonçalves J; Conde-Sousa E; Egeland T; Amorim A; Pinto N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():71-79. PubMed ID: 28380400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A general method to assess the utility of the X-chromosomal markers in kinship testing.
Pinto N; Silva PV; Amorim A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):198-207. PubMed ID: 21592877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing the information increase through the addition of relatives and genetic markers in identification and kinship cases.
Pinto N; Simões R; Amorim A; Conde-Sousa E
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():210-218. PubMed ID: 30921688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. General derivation of the sets of pedigrees with the same kinship coefficients.
Pinto N; Silva PV; Amorim A
Hum Hered; 2010; 70(3):194-204. PubMed ID: 20720433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved pairwise kinship analysis using massively parallel sequencing.
Li R; Li H; Peng D; Hao B; Wang Z; Huang E; Wu R; Sun H
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():77-85. PubMed ID: 30368110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. X-chromosome markers in kinship testing: a generalisation of the IBD approach identifying situations where their contribution is crucial.
Pinto N; Gusmão L; Amorim A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 20457080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the efficacy of paternity and kinship testing based on single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Mo SK; Liu YC; Wang SQ; Bo XC; Li Z; Chen Y; Ni M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():161-168. PubMed ID: 26952733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of linkage between vWA and D12S391 in kinship analysis.
O'Connor KL; Tillmar AO
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):840-4. PubMed ID: 22542849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Kinship assignment with the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit: Sources of error in simulated and real cases.
Pilli E; Tarallo R; Riccia P; Berti A; Novelletto A
Sci Justice; 2022 Jan; 62(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 35033321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On identification problems requiring linked autosomal markers.
Egeland T; Sheehan N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 19083824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.
Phillips C; Fondevila M; García-Magariños M; Rodriguez A; Salas A; Carracedo A; Lareu MV
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 19083821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A general approach to power calculation for relationship testing.
Egeland T; Pinto N; Vigeland MD
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():186-90. PubMed ID: 23810238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pedigree-based relationship inference from complex DNA mixtures.
Dørum G; Kaur N; Gysi M
Int J Legal Med; 2017 May; 131(3):629-641. PubMed ID: 28101646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Kinship testing with X-chromosomal markers: mathematical and statistical issues.
Krawczak M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19083739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Choosing relatives for DNA identification of missing persons.
Ge J; Budowle B; Chakraborty R
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S23-8. PubMed ID: 21155801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pairwise relatedness testing in the context of inbreeding: expectation and variance of the likelihood ratio.
Brustad HK; Vigeland MD; Egeland T
Int J Legal Med; 2021 Jan; 135(1):117-129. PubMed ID: 32989564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The likelihood ratio as a random variable for linked markers in kinship analysis.
Egeland T; Slooten K
Int J Legal Med; 2016 Nov; 130(6):1445-1456. PubMed ID: 27519910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Paternity exclusion power: comparative behaviour of autosomal and X-chromosomal markers in standard and deficient cases with inbreeding.
Pinto N; Gusmão L; Egeland T; Amorim A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Feb; 7(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 23312390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resolving a 150-year-old paternity case in Mormon history using DTC autosomal DNA testing of distant relatives.
Perego UA; Bodner M; Raveane A; Woodward SR; Montinaro F; Parson W; Achilli A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():1-7. PubMed ID: 31195186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
Piver MS
Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
