These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28380400)

  • 21. DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): Guidelines on the use of X-STRs in kinship analysis.
    Tillmar AO; Kling D; Butler JM; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Egeland T; Gusmão L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():269-275. PubMed ID: 28544956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prioritising family members for genotyping in missing person cases: A general approach combining the statistical power of exclusion and inclusion.
    Vigeland MD; Marsico FL; Herrera Piñero M; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Nov; 49():102376. PubMed ID: 32979623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Strategies for pairwise searches in forensic kinship analysis.
    Brustad HK; Colucci M; Jobling MA; Sheehan NA; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Sep; 54():102562. PubMed ID: 34274795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of DNA-based identification software by computation of pedigree likelihood ratios.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 20727843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mixtures with relatives and linked markers.
    Dørum G; Kling D; Tillmar A; Vigeland MD; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):621-34. PubMed ID: 26614310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Discrimination of relationships with the same degree of kinship using chromosomal sharing patterns estimated from high-density SNPs.
    Morimoto C; Manabe S; Fujimoto S; Hamano Y; Tamaki K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():10-16. PubMed ID: 29172066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Kinship analysis: assessment of related vs unrelated based on defined pedigrees.
    Turrina S; Ferrian M; Caratti S; Cosentino E; De Leo D
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jan; 130(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 26590134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of Trio Half Sibling Testing.
    Li HX; Chen H; Li R; Zang Y; Sun HY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 39(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 37517013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Missing Person problem through the lens of information theory.
    Marsico F; Sibilla G; Escobar MS; Chernomoretz A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 May; 70():103025. PubMed ID: 38382248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Application of Microhaplotypes in Sibling Kinship Testing.
    Tang X; Wen D; Wang CD; Xu RY; Jia HT; Li JN; Zhalaga BY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 39(3):288-295. PubMed ID: 37517018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mixtures with relatives: a pedigree perspective.
    Egeland T; Dørum G; Vigeland MD; Sheehan NA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 May; 10():49-54. PubMed ID: 24572837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Distinguishing pedigree relationships via multi-way identity by descent sharing and sex-specific genetic maps.
    Qiao Y; Sannerud JG; Basu-Roy S; Hayward C; Williams AL
    Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Jan; 108(1):68-83. PubMed ID: 33385324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. IPED2X: a robust pedigree reconstruction algorithm for complicated pedigrees.
    He D; Eskin E
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2014 Dec; 12(6):1442007. PubMed ID: 25553812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Maximum likelihood pedigree reconstruction using integer linear programming.
    Cussens J; Bartlett M; Jones EM; Sheehan NA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 37(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 23034892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exploring the applicability of analysing X chromosome STRs in Brazilian admixed population.
    Auler-Bittencourt E; Iwamura ES; Lima MJ; da Silva ID; dos Santos SE
    Sci Justice; 2015 Sep; 55(5):323-8. PubMed ID: 26385714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Set up of cutoff thresholds for kinship determination using SNP loci.
    Cho S; Shin ES; Yu HJ; Lee JH; Seo HJ; Kim MY; Lee SD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():1-8. PubMed ID: 28342368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Empowering sibship analyses with reference pedigrees.
    Wenk RE; Shao A
    Transfusion; 2012 Dec; 52(12):2614-9. PubMed ID: 22486247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Enhanced kinship analysis and STR-based DNA typing for human identification in mass fatality incidents: the Swissair flight 111 disaster.
    Leclair B; Frégeau CJ; Bowen KL; Fourney RM
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Sep; 49(5):939-53. PubMed ID: 15461094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of advanced multiplex short tandem repeat systems in pairwise kinship analysis.
    Tamura T; Osawa M; Ochiai E; Suzuki T; Nakamura T
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Sep; 17(5):320-5. PubMed ID: 25851967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. GHEP-ISFG collaborative simulated exercise for DVI/MPI: Lessons learned about large-scale profile database comparisons.
    Vullo CM; Romero M; Catelli L; Šakić M; Saragoni VG; Jimenez Pleguezuelos MJ; Romanini C; Anjos Porto MJ; Puente Prieto J; Bofarull Castro A; Hernandez A; Farfán MJ; Prieto V; Alvarez D; Penacino G; Zabalza S; Hernández Bolaños A; Miguel Manterola I; Prieto L; Parsons T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():45-53. PubMed ID: 26716885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.