These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28381373)

  • 1. The use of patient-specific implants in orthognathic surgery: A series of 30 mandible sagittal split osteotomy patients.
    Suojanen J; Leikola J; Stoor P
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 45(6):990-994. PubMed ID: 28381373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No differences in infections between patient-specific implants and conventional mini-plates in mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy - Up to 3-year follow-up.
    Suojanen J; Järvinen S; Hodzic Z; Reunanen J; Leikola J; Stoor P
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Aug; 47(8):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 31178267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of patient-specific implants in orthognathic surgery: A series of 32 maxillary osteotomy patients.
    Suojanen J; Leikola J; Stoor P
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec; 44(12):1913-1916. PubMed ID: 27769722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: evaluation of mandible registration accuracy and report of the first clinical cases of navigated sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Naujokat H; Rohnen M; Lichtenstein J; Birkenfeld F; Gerle M; Flörke C; Wiltfang J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 46(10):1291-1297. PubMed ID: 28566140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy lingual fracture line and le fort I pterygomaxillary separation in orthognathic surgery using cadaver heads: ultrasonic osteotome versus conventional saw.
    Dammous S; Dupont Q; Gilles R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 73(6):1169-80. PubMed ID: 25795191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bad split during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible with separators: a retrospective study of 427 patients.
    Mensink G; Verweij JP; Frank MD; Eelco Bergsma J; Richard van Merkesteyn JP
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 51(6):525-9. PubMed ID: 23305697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Modified Novel Technique for Condylar Positioning in Mandibular Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Using Computer-Assisted Designed and Computer-Assisted Manufactured Surgical Guides.
    Cortese A; Chandran R; Borri A; Cataldo E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 May; 77(5):1069.e1-1069.e9. PubMed ID: 31046965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short- and long-term changes of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement in combination with Le Fort I osteotomy evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography.
    Chen S; Lei J; Wang X; Fu KY; Farzad P; Yi B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1956-66. PubMed ID: 23973047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Skeletal stability after mandible bilateral sagittal split osteotomy - comparison of patient-specific implant and mini-plate fixation: A retrospective study.
    Merta M; Kiukkonen A; Leikola J; Stoor P; Suojanen J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Jan; 52(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 38129183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment Strategy for Condyle/Ramus Deficiency Using 3D Virtual Surgery and CAD/CAM Technologies; Total Joint Replacement or Inverted-L Osteotomy.
    Maeng JY; Ha SH; Baek SH; Choi JY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2023 May; 34(3):e263-e268. PubMed ID: 36653911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of a computer-generated guiding device in bilateral sagittal split osteotomies.
    Abdel-Moniem Barakat A; Abou-ElFetouh A; Hakam MM; El-Hawary H; Abdel-Ghany KM
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e195-203. PubMed ID: 24099655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided design and computer-aided modeling (CAD/CAM) generated surgical splints, cutting guides and custom-made implants: Which indications in orthognathic surgery?
    Scolozzi P
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale; 2015 Dec; 116(6):343-9. PubMed ID: 26598243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orthognathic positioning system: intraoperative system to transfer virtual surgical plan to operating field during orthognathic surgery.
    Polley JW; Figueroa AA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 71(5):911-20. PubMed ID: 23312847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Virtual Surgical Planning Combined With Intraoperative Navigation in Mandibular Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy for Accurate Placement of Patient Specific Implants.
    Järvinen S; Suojanen J; Suomalainen A; Stoor P
    J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 32(8):2666-2670. PubMed ID: 34260465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of bone formation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy using different fixation materials.
    Ueki K; Ishihara Y; Yoshizawa K; Moroi A; Ikawa H; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Hotta A; Tsutsui T; Saida Y
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):710-6. PubMed ID: 25887426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3D vector analysis of mandibular condyle stability in mandibular setback surgery with bicortical bioabsorbable screw fixation.
    Lee JH; Kim SM; Lee BK; Jeon JH; Kim MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e105-10. PubMed ID: 24172189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The stability of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy and vertical ramus osteotomy after bimaxillary correction of class III malocclusion.
    Abeltins A; Jakobsone G; Urtane I; Bigestans A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):583-7. PubMed ID: 21334219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of computer-assisted design and manufactured three-dimensional device for condylar positioning in mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (clinical trial).
    Habib AA; Sharara AA; Yousry TN; Swidan AO
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 Apr; 137(4):331-337. PubMed ID: 38155012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of overlapped cortical bone area after modified plate fixation with bent plate in sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Ueki K; Marukawa K; Moroi A; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Nakano Y; Higuchi M; Nakazawa R; Ikawa H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e210-6. PubMed ID: 24095217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.