These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28382391)

  • 1. Maverick total disc arthroplasty performs well at 10 years follow-up: a prospective study with HRQL and balance analysis.
    Plais N; Thevenot X; Cogniet A; Rigal J; Le Huec JC
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Mar; 27(3):720-727. PubMed ID: 28382391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up.
    Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motion preservation following total lumbar disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction: a prospective long-term clinical and radiographic investigation.
    Wuertinger C; Annes RDÀ; Hitzl W; Siepe CJ
    Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 28673830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamics of improvement following total lumbar disc replacement: is the outcome predictable?
    Siepe CJ; Tepass A; Hitzl W; Meschede P; Beisse R; Korge A; Mayer HM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2579-86. PubMed ID: 19927108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of a mismatched center of rotation on the clinical outcomes and flexion-extension range of motion: lumbar total disk replacement using mobidisc at a 5.5-year follow-up.
    Lee CS; Lee DH; Hwang CJ; Kim H; Noh H
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 May; 27(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 22525508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical outcome of monosegmental total disc replacement for lumbar disc disease with ball-and-socket prosthesis (Maverick): prospective study with four-year follow-up.
    Van de Kelft E; Verguts L
    World Neurosurg; 2012; 78(3-4):355-63. PubMed ID: 22120556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term clinical results following Charite III lumbar total disc replacement.
    Lu S; Sun S; Kong C; Sun W; Hu H; Wang Q; Hai Y
    Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):917-925. PubMed ID: 28870839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mid- to long-term results of total disc replacement for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review.
    Cui XD; Li HT; Zhang W; Zhang LL; Luo ZP; Yang HL
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 13(1):326. PubMed ID: 30585142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical outcome of lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc-L in degenerative disc disease: minimum 5-year follow-up results at a single institute.
    Park CK; Ryu KS; Lee KY; Lee HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(8):672-7. PubMed ID: 21857395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Results of Activ L Total Disk Replacement at 1- to 3-Year Follow-up.
    Lu S; Kong C; Hai Y; Kang N; Zang L; Wang Y; Yuan Y
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Nov; 28(9):E544-50. PubMed ID: 25532603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An 11-year minimum follow-up of the Charite III lumbar disc replacement for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease.
    Lu SB; Hai Y; Kong C; Wang QY; Su Q; Zang L; Kang N; Meng XL; Wang Y
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Sep; 24(9):2056-64. PubMed ID: 25895882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and radiological outcome at 10 years of follow-up after total cervical disc replacement.
    Mehren C; Heider F; Siepe CJ; Zillner B; Kothe R; Korge A; Mayer HM
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2441-2449. PubMed ID: 28676980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Total disc replacement versus multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative discs: 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled multicenter trial.
    Furunes H; Storheim K; Brox JI; Johnsen LG; Skouen JS; Franssen E; Solberg TK; Sandvik L; Hellum C
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1480-1488. PubMed ID: 28583869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lumbar disc arthroplasty versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion: 5-year outcomes for patients in the Maverick disc investigational device exemption study.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; Peloza JH; Schranck FW; Copay AG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 May; 31(3):347-356. PubMed ID: 31100723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcomes, radiologic kinematics, and effects on sagittal balance of the 6 df LP-ESP lumbar disc prosthesis.
    Lazennec JY; Even J; Skalli W; Rakover JP; Brusson A; Rousseau MA
    Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):1914-20. PubMed ID: 24262858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postoperative posterior lumbar muscle changes and their relationship to segmental motion preservation or restriction: a randomized prospective study.
    Strube P; Putzier M; Streitparth F; Hoff EK; Hartwig T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 26360146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
    Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Total disc replacement for lumbar degenerative disc disease: single centre 20 years experience.
    Formica C; Zanirato A; Divano S; Basso M; Cavagnaro L; Alessio Mazzola M; Vellone VG; Mastrogiacomo M; Berjano P; Felli L; Formica M
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1518-1526. PubMed ID: 31399849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ten-year survival and clinical outcome of the AcroFlex lumbar disc replacement for the treatment of symptomatic disc degeneration.
    Meir AR; Freeman BJ; Fraser RD; Fowler SM
    Spine J; 2013 Jan; 13(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 23384880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lumbar total disc replacement: correlation of clinical outcome and radiological parameters.
    Boss OL; Tomasi SO; Bäurle B; Sgier F; Hausmann ON
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2013 Oct; 155(10):1923-30. PubMed ID: 23748926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.