194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28382657)
1. Accuracy and Reliability of the Klales et al. (2012) Morphoscopic Pelvic Sexing Method.
Lesciotto KM; Doershuk LJ
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):214-220. PubMed ID: 28382657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adapting and Applying the Phenice (1969) Adult Morphological Sex Estimation Technique to Subadults.
Klales AR; Burns TL
J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):747-752. PubMed ID: 28168696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recalibration of the Klales et al. (2012) method of sexing the human innominate for Mexican populations.
Gómez-Valdés JA; Menéndez Garmendia A; García-Barzola L; Sánchez-Mejorada G; Karam C; Baraybar JP; Klales A
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2017 Mar; 162(3):600-604. PubMed ID: 28117482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Worldwide population variation in pelvic sexual dimorphism: A validation and recalibration of the Klales et al. method.
Kenyhercz MW; Klales AR; Stull KE; McCormick KA; Cole SJ
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():259.e1-259.e8. PubMed ID: 28666560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Secular Change in Morphological Pelvic Traits used for Sex Estimation.
Klales AR
J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 27404602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A revised method of sexing the human innominate using Phenice's nonmetric traits and statistical methods.
Klales AR; Ousley SD; Vollner JM
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2012 Sep; 149(1):104-14. PubMed ID: 22714398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The accuracy of 3D virtual bone models of the pelvis for morphological sex estimation.
Colman KL; van der Merwe AE; Stull KE; Dobbe JGG; Streekstra GJ; van Rijn RR; Oostra RJ; de Boer HH
Int J Legal Med; 2019 Nov; 133(6):1853-1860. PubMed ID: 30680527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sex estimation of skeletons in middle and late adulthood: reliability of pelvic morphological traits and long bone metrics on an Italian skeletal collection.
Selliah P; Martino F; Cummaudo M; Indra L; Biehler-Gomez L; Campobasso CP; Cattaneo C
Int J Legal Med; 2020 Sep; 134(5):1683-1690. PubMed ID: 32300869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Validation Study of the Langley et al. (2017) Decision Tree Model for Sex Estimation.
Garvin HM; Klales AR
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1243-1251. PubMed ID: 29148064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Influence of Body Size on the Expression of Sexually Dimorphic Morphological Traits.
Horbaly HE; Kenyhercz MW; Hubbe M; Steadman DW
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 29975982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Test of the DSP Sexing Method on CT Images from a Modern French Sample.
Mestekova S; Bruzek J; Veleminska J; Chaumoitre K
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Sep; 60(5):1295-9. PubMed ID: 26258990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving Nonmetric Sex Classification for Hispanic Individuals.
Klales AR; Cole SJ
J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jul; 62(4):975-980. PubMed ID: 28070893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A method of sexing the human os coxae based on logistic regressions and Bruzek's nonmetric traits.
Santos F; Guyomarc'h P; Rmoutilova R; Bruzek J
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2019 Jul; 169(3):435-447. PubMed ID: 31093965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A test of the phenice method for the estimation of sex.
Ubelaker DH; Volk CG
J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jan; 47(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 12064650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How low can we go? A skeletal maturity threshold for probabilistic visual sex estimation from immature human os coxae.
Corron LK; Santos F; Adalian P; Chaumoitre K; Guyomarc'h P; Marchal F; Brůžek J
Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Aug; 325():110854. PubMed ID: 34091409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Virtual determination of sex: metric and nonmetric traits of the adult pelvis from 3D computed tomography models.
Decker SJ; Davy-Jow SL; Ford JM; Hilbelink DR
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1107-14. PubMed ID: 21595690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sex determination using the Probabilistic Sex Diagnosis (DSP: Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste) tool in a virtual environment.
Chapman T; Lefevre P; Semal P; Moiseev F; Sholukha V; Louryan S; Rooze M; Van Sint Jan S
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jan; 234():189.e1-8. PubMed ID: 24290894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sex assessment from the pelvis: a test of the Phenice (1969) and Klales et al. (2012) methods.
Jager VR; Eliopoulos C
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37535230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of methods to determine sex by evaluating the greater sciatic notch: Visual, angular and geometric morphometrics.
Gómez-Valdés JA; Quinto-Sánchez M; Menéndez Garmendia A; Veleminska J; Sánchez-Mejorada G; Bruzek J
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Sep; 221(1-3):156.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22607977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A method for estimating sex using metric analysis of the scapula.
Dabbs GR; Moore-Jansen PH
J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):149-52. PubMed ID: 20002272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
