These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28382935)

  • 1. Neuroanatomical correlates of forgiving unintentional harms.
    Patil I; Calò M; Fornasier F; Young L; Silani G
    Sci Rep; 2017 Apr; 7():45967. PubMed ID: 28382935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The behavioral and neural basis of empathic blame.
    Patil I; Calò M; Fornasier F; Cushman F; Silani G
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):5200. PubMed ID: 28701703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Innocent intentions: a correlation between forgiveness for accidental harm and neural activity.
    Young L; Saxe R
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2065-72. PubMed ID: 19467357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural correlates of forgiveness for moral transgressions involving deception.
    Hayashi A; Abe N; Ueno A; Shigemune Y; Mori E; Tashiro M; Fujii T
    Brain Res; 2010 May; 1332():90-9. PubMed ID: 20307505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When minds matter for moral judgment: intent information is neurally encoded for harmful but not impure acts.
    Chakroff A; Dungan J; Koster-Hale J; Brown A; Saxe R; Young L
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Mar; 11(3):476-84. PubMed ID: 26628642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural evidence for "intuitive prosecution": the use of mental state information for negative moral verdicts.
    Young L; Scholz J; Saxe R
    Soc Neurosci; 2011; 6(3):302-15. PubMed ID: 21271462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions.
    Koster-Hale J; Saxe R; Dungan J; Young LL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Apr; 110(14):5648-53. PubMed ID: 23479657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Judging accidental harm: Reasoning style modulates the weight of intention and harm severity.
    Schwartz F; Djeriouat H; Trémolière B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Dec; 75(12):2366-2381. PubMed ID: 35285342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integration of Intention and Outcome for Moral Judgment in Frontotemporal Dementia: Brain Structural Signatures.
    Baez S; Kanske P; Matallana D; Montañes P; Reyes P; Slachevsky A; Matus C; Vigliecca NS; Torralva T; Manes F; Ibanez A
    Neurodegener Dis; 2016; 16(3-4):206-17. PubMed ID: 26859768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in moral judgment competence are related to activity of the prefrontal cortex when attributing blame to evil intention.
    Li X; Yang J; Li P; Li H
    Soc Neurosci; 2016; 11(4):438-48. PubMed ID: 26569419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impaired theory of mind for moral judgment in high-functioning autism.
    Moran JM; Young LL; Saxe R; Lee SM; O'Young D; Mavros PL; Gabrieli JD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Feb; 108(7):2688-92. PubMed ID: 21282628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains.
    Young L; Saxe R
    Cognition; 2011 Aug; 120(2):202-14. PubMed ID: 21601839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The development of intent-based moral judgment.
    Cushman F; Sheketoff R; Wharton S; Carey S
    Cognition; 2013 Apr; 127(1):6-21. PubMed ID: 23318350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Weighing outcome vs. intent across societies: How cultural models of mind shape moral reasoning.
    McNamara RA; Willard AK; Norenzayan A; Henrich J
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():95-108. PubMed ID: 30227333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing the role of belief information in moral judgments by stimulating the right temporoparietal junction.
    Sellaro R; Güroǧlu B; Nitsche MA; van den Wildenberg WP; Massaro V; Durieux J; Hommel B; Colzato LS
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():400-8. PubMed ID: 26375450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural correlates of the judgment of lying: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Harada T; Itakura S; Xu F; Lee K; Nakashita S; Saito DN; Sadato N
    Neurosci Res; 2009 Jan; 63(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 18992288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining overlap in behavioral and neural representations of morals, facts, and preferences.
    Theriault J; Waytz A; Heiphetz L; Young L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Nov; 146(11):1586-1605. PubMed ID: 28805441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asking 'why?' enhances theory of mind when evaluating harm but not purity violations.
    Dungan JA; Young L
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 14(7):699-708. PubMed ID: 31269193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Children are more forgiving of accidental harms across development.
    Amir D; Ahl RE; Parsons WS; McAuliffe K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 May; 205():105081. PubMed ID: 33477080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of negligence, intention, and outcome on children's moral judgments.
    Nobes G; Panagiotaki G; Pawson C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Dec; 104(4):382-97. PubMed ID: 19740483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.