161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28383000)
1. Label the limits of forensic science.
Mejia R
Nature; 2017 Apr; 544(7648):7. PubMed ID: 28383000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The legal framework for more robust forensic science evidence.
Rt Hon. the Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion.
Association of Forensic Science Providers
Sci Justice; 2009 Sep; 49(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 19839414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Scientific integrity in the forensic sciences: Consumerism, conflicts of interest, and transparency.
Passalacqua NV; Pilloud MA; Belcher WR
Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):573-579. PubMed ID: 31472803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Strengthening forensic science: a way station on the journey to justice.
Bohan TL
J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 20412154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion Association of Forensic Science Providers.
Willis S
Sci Justice; 2010 Mar; 50(1):49. PubMed ID: 20408380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Science convicting the innocent.
Berger K
Med Law; 2010 Mar; 29(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22457993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation and professionalism.
Evett I
Sci Justice; 2009 Sep; 49(3):159-60. PubMed ID: 19839413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychiatric evidence on trial.
Davoli JI
SMU Law Rev; 2003; 56(4):2191-234. PubMed ID: 14689986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Formulation and communication of evaluative forensic science expert opinion-A GHEP-ISFG contribution to the establishment of standards.
Amorim A; Crespillo M; Luque JA; Prieto L; Garcia O; Gusmão L; Aler M; Barrio PA; Saragoni VG; Pinto N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():210-213. PubMed ID: 27690358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Criminal court expert reports].
Fontaine L
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2011 Apr; 112(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 20688347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality management systems and the admissibility of scientific evidence: the Costa Rican experience.
Salas M; Gomez D
Bull Narc; 2005; 57(1-2):259-69. PubMed ID: 21338026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Questions about forensic science.
Harmon R; Budowle B
Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):607-10; author reply 607-10. PubMed ID: 16456063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Commentary on: Page M, Taylor J, Blenkin M. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part I--a quantitative analysis of the exclusion of forensic identification science evidence. J Forensic Sci 2011;56(5):1180-4.
Mohammed LA; Singer K
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):1142; author reply 1143. PubMed ID: 22748154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Weakening forensic science in Spain: from expert evidence to documentary evidence.
Lucena-Molina JJ; Pardo-Iranzo V; Gonzalez-Rodriguez J
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):952-63. PubMed ID: 22329955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Forensic science and human rights: the challenges.
Sir Jack Beatson
Med Sci Law; 2009 Oct; 49(4):229-40. PubMed ID: 20025099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Forensic science standards in fast-changing environments.
Sommer P
Sci Justice; 2010 Mar; 50(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 20408377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The forensic expert witness--an issue of competency.
Hiss J; Freund M; Kahana T
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 May; 168(2-3):89-94. PubMed ID: 16842948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part II--judicial reasoning in decisions to exclude forensic identification evidence on grounds of reliability.
Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):913-7. PubMed ID: 21729081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Commentary on: Page M, Taylor J, Blenkin M. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part II--judicial reasoning in decisions to exclude forensic identification evidence on grounds of reliability. J Forensic Sci 2011;56(4):913-7.
Hart RP
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jan; 57(1):278. PubMed ID: 22150396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
