These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28383801)

  • 21. Ecological Recovery and Resilience in Environmental Risk Assessments at the European Food Safety Authority.
    Brock T; Bigler F; Frampton G; Hogstrand C; Luttik R; Martin-Laurent F; Topping CJ; van der Werf W; Rortais A
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Sep; 14(5):586-591. PubMed ID: 30489025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Toward sustainable environmental quality: Identifying priority research questions for Latin America.
    Furley TH; Brodeur J; Silva de Assis HC; Carriquiriborde P; Chagas KR; Corrales J; Denadai M; Fuchs J; Mascarenhas R; Miglioranza KS; Miguez Caramés DM; Navas JM; Nugegoda D; Planes E; Rodriguez-Jorquera IA; Orozco-Medina M; Boxall AB; Rudd MA; Brooks BW
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 May; 14(3):344-357. PubMed ID: 29469193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reporting and evaluation criteria as means towards a transparent use of ecotoxicity data for environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals.
    Ågerstrand M; Küster A; Bachmann J; Breitholtz M; Ebert I; Rechenberg B; Rudén C
    Environ Pollut; 2011 Oct; 159(10):2487-92. PubMed ID: 21763042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Incorporation of sediment- and soil-specific aspects in the Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating Ecotoxicity Data (CRED).
    Casado-Martinez M; Dell'Ambrogio G; Campiche S; Kroll A; Lauber E; Marti-Roura M; Mendez-Fernandez L; Renaud M; Tierbach A; Wildi M; Wong JWY; Werner I; Junghans M; Ferrari BJD
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38780110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of new scientific developments in regulatory risk assessments: challenges and opportunities.
    Tarazona JV
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e85-91. PubMed ID: 23625625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Open Science in regulatory environmental risk assessment.
    Brock TCM; Elliott KC; Gladbach A; Moermond C; Romeis J; Seiler TB; Solomon K; Peter Dohmen G
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2021 Nov; 17(6):1229-1242. PubMed ID: 33913617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Key challenges and developments in wildlife ecological risk assessment: Problem formulation.
    Sample BE; Johnson MS; Hull RN; Kapustka L; Landis WG; Murphy CA; Sorensen M; Mann G; Gust KA; Mayfield DB; Ludwigs JD; Munns WR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2024 May; 20(3):658-673. PubMed ID: 36325881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Risk analysis and technology assessment in support of technology development: Putting responsible innovation in practice in a case study for nanotechnology.
    van Wezel AP; van Lente H; van de Sandt JJ; Bouwmeester H; Vandeberg RL; Sips AJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Jan; 14(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 28901636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Uncertainties in biological responses that influence hazard and risk approaches to the regulation of endocrine active substances.
    Parrott JL; Bjerregaard P; Brugger KE; Gray LE; Iguchi T; Kadlec SM; Weltje L; Wheeler JR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 27862884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sequential analysis of lines of evidence--an advanced weight-of-evidence approach for ecological risk assessment.
    Hull RN; Swanson S
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Oct; 2(4):302-11. PubMed ID: 17069173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A refined ecological risk assessment for California red-legged frog, Delta smelt, and California tiger salamander exposed to malathion.
    Clemow YH; Manning GE; Breton RL; Winchell MF; Padilla L; Rodney SI; Hanzas JP; Estes TL; Budreski K; Toth BN; Hill KL; Priest CD; Teed RS; Knopper LD; Moore DR; Stone CT; Whatling P
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Mar; 14(2):224-239. PubMed ID: 29087623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Environmental Goals Addressed in Assessments of Contaminated Sediments.
    Bruce P; Ohlsson Y
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Jan; 16(1):128-139. PubMed ID: 31674716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. PBT assessment using the revised annex XIII of REACH: a comparison with other regulatory frameworks.
    Moermond CT; Janssen MP; de Knecht JA; Montforts MH; Peijnenburg WJ; Zweers PG; Sijm DT
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 22006646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Integrating causation in investigative ecological weight of evidence assessments.
    Stevenson RW; Chapman PM
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):702-713. PubMed ID: 27787954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An introduction to Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating Exposure Datasets (CREED) for use in environmental assessments.
    Merrington G; Nowell LH; Peck C
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2024 Jul; 20(4):975-980. PubMed ID: 38329199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. European Union regulators and industry agree on improving specific environmental release categories: Report from the exchange network for exposure scenarios specific environmental release category workshop on May 13, 2016.
    Ahrens A; Moilanen M; Martin S; Garcia-John E; Sättler D; Bakker J; Reihlen A; Wind T; Tolls J
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Sep; 13(5):815-820. PubMed ID: 28121063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Applying weight of evidence methods to assessing exposure in aquatic environments: Comparing lines of evidence.
    Miglino AN; Holmes CM
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2023 Sep; 19(5):1207-1219. PubMed ID: 35253366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Environmental Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials in the Light of New Obligations Under the REACH Regulation: Which Challenges Remain and How to Approach Them?
    Schwirn K; Voelker D; Galert W; Quik J; Tietjen L
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Sep; 16(5):706-717. PubMed ID: 32175661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reproducibility, reliability, and regulatory relevance of plant visual injury assessments.
    Fellmann S; Duffner A; Kirkwood A; Lopez-Mancisidor P; Arnie J; Krueger H; du Hoffmann G; Wolf J; Kraetzig G; Springer T; Isemer R
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2024 Jul; 20(4):915-923. PubMed ID: 37861068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application of chemical toxicity distributions to ecotoxicology data requirements under REACH.
    Williams ES; Berninger JP; Brooks BW
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Aug; 30(8):1943-54. PubMed ID: 21590796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.