These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28383949)

  • 1. Conditional reliability coefficients for test scores.
    Nicewander WA
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Jun; 23(2):351-362. PubMed ID: 28383949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conditional Precision of Measurement for Test Scores: Are Conditional Standard Errors Sufficient?
    Nicewander WA
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Feb; 79(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 30636779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement precision at the cut score in medical multiple choice exams: Theory matters.
    Lahner FM; Schauber S; Lörwald AC; Kropf R; Guttormsen S; Fischer MR; Huwendiek S
    Perspect Med Educ; 2020 Aug; 9(4):220-228. PubMed ID: 32468274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychometric properties for the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: dichotomous versus polytomous conventional and IRT scoring.
    Vispoel WP; Kim HY
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):878-91. PubMed ID: 24708082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Latent variables should remain as such: Evidence from a Monte Carlo study.
    Rdz-Navarro K
    J Gen Psychol; 2019; 146(4):417-442. PubMed ID: 31008695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A note on monotonicity of item response functions for ordered polytomous item response theory models.
    Kang HA; Su YH; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Nov; 71(3):523-535. PubMed ID: 29516492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison of Two Methods for Computing IRT Scores From the Number-Correct Score.
    Nicewander WA; Schulz EM
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Nov; 39(8):643-655. PubMed ID: 29882547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Approximate Functional Relationship between IRT and CTT Item Discrimination Indices: A Simulation, Validation, and Practical Extension of Lord's (1980) Formula.
    Kulas JT; Smith JA; Xu H
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 29252208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measure for measure: new developments in measurement and item response theory.
    Streiner DL
    Can J Psychiatry; 2010 Mar; 55(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 20370969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparison of Three Empirical Reliability Estimates for Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) Using a Medical Licensing Examination.
    Seo DG; Jung S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():681. PubMed ID: 30002633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Information utility: quantifying the total psychometric information provided by a measure.
    Markon KE
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Mar; 18(1):15-35. PubMed ID: 23477605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical Foundations for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Response Revision.
    Wang S; Fellouris G; Chang HH
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):375-394. PubMed ID: 30805879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methodological issues regarding power of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT)-based approaches for the comparison of patient-reported outcomes in two groups of patients--a simulation study.
    Sébille V; Hardouin JB; Le Néel T; Kubis G; Boyer F; Guillemin F; Falissard B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Mar; 10():24. PubMed ID: 20338031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of psychometric properties and differential item functioning of 8-item Child Perceptions Questionnaires using item response theory.
    Yau DT; Wong MC; Lam KF; McGrath C
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Aug; 15():792. PubMed ID: 26286333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving measurement in health education and health behavior research using item response modeling: comparison with the classical test theory approach.
    Wilson M; Allen DD; Li JC
    Health Educ Res; 2006 Dec; 21 Suppl 1():i19-32. PubMed ID: 16880221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education.
    De Champlain AF
    Med Educ; 2010 Jan; 44(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 20078762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Estimation of Cronbach's alpha coefficient in the context of item response theory].
    Shojima K; Toyoda H
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2002 Aug; 73(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 12436881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A causal theory of error scores.
    van Bork R; Rhemtulla M; Sijtsma K; Borsboom D
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Aug; 29(4):807-826. PubMed ID: 35878074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using generalizability theory with continuous latent response variables.
    Vispoel WP; Morris CA; Kilinc M
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Apr; 24(2):153-178. PubMed ID: 30080056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An illustration of the effects of fluctuations in test information on measurement error, the attenuation of effect sizes, and diagnostic reliability.
    O'Connor BP
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Aug; 30(8):991-1003. PubMed ID: 28301193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.