These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28383957)

  • 1. Accumulating evidence about what prospective memory costs actually reveal.
    Strickland L; Heathcote A; Remington RW; Loft S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1616-1629. PubMed ID: 28383957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wait a second: Brief delays in responding reduce focality effects in event-based prospective memory.
    Loft S; Remington RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1432-47. PubMed ID: 23281819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Slow down and remember to remember! A delay theory of prospective memory costs.
    Heathcote A; Loft S; Remington RW
    Psychol Rev; 2015 Apr; 122(2):376-410. PubMed ID: 25844878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Target context specification can reduce costs in nonfocal prospective memory.
    Lourenço JS; White K; Maylor EA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1757-64. PubMed ID: 23834056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling criterion shifts and target checking in prospective memory monitoring.
    Horn SS; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):95-117. PubMed ID: 25151245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhanced recognition of words previously presented in a task with nonfocal prospective memory requirements.
    Loft S; Humphreys MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):1142-7. PubMed ID: 22847597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Racing to remember: A theory of decision control in event-based prospective memory.
    Strickland L; Loft S; Remington RW; Heathcote A
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Nov; 125(6):851-887. PubMed ID: 30080068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A thorough examination of cue specificity and task-appropriateness in defining focal and nonfocal prospective memory tasks.
    Lyon BA; Hicks JL
    Memory; 2023 May; 31(5):665-677. PubMed ID: 36945870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of focal and nonfocal cues on the neural correlates of prospective memory: insights from ERPs.
    Cona G; Bisiacchi PS; Moscovitch M
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Oct; 24(10):2630-46. PubMed ID: 23645716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrieval in prospective memory: Multiple processes or just delay?
    Anderson FT; McDaniel MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2197-2207. PubMed ID: 30957661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prior task experience and comparable stimulus exposure nullify focal and nonfocal prospective memory retrieval differences.
    Hicks JL; Franks BA; Spitler SN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1997-2006. PubMed ID: 27461749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Allowing brief delays in responding improves event-based prospective memory for young adults living with HIV disease.
    Loft S; Doyle KL; Naar-King S; Outlaw AY; Nichols SL; Weber E; Casaletto KB; Woods SP
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(7):761-72. PubMed ID: 25116075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fitting an ex-Gaussian function to examine costs in event-based prospective memory: evidence for a continuous monitoring profile.
    Loft S; Bowden VK; Ball BH; Brewer GA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Oct; 152():177-82. PubMed ID: 25247678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Internalizing versus externalizing control: different ways to perform a time-based prospective memory task.
    Huang T; Loft S; Humphreys MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1064-71. PubMed ID: 24548325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event-based prospective memory deficits in individuals with high depressive symptomatology: problems controlling attentional resources?
    Li YR; Loft S; Weinborn M; Maybery MT
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(6):577-87. PubMed ID: 24848441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acute stress shifts the balance between controlled and automatic processes in prospective memory.
    Möschl M; Walser M; Plessow F; Goschke T; Fischer R
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2017 Oct; 144():53-67. PubMed ID: 28625494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating prospective memory via eye tracking: No evidence for a monitoring deficit in older adults.
    Ballhausen N; Lauffs MM; Herzog MH; Kliegel M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():107-116. PubMed ID: 31655183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dealing with prospective memory demands while performing an ongoing task: Shared processing, increased on-task focus, or both?
    Rummel J; Smeekens BA; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1047-1062. PubMed ID: 27936845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance predictions affect attentional processes of event-based prospective memory.
    Rummel J; Kuhlmann BG; Touron DR
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):729-41. PubMed ID: 23703025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive control and capacity for prospective memory in complex dynamic environments.
    Boag RJ; Strickland L; Heathcote A; Neal A; Loft S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Dec; 148(12):2181-2206. PubMed ID: 31008627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.