These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28383965)

  • 21. Parafoveal letter-position coding in reading.
    Snell J; Bertrand D; Grainger J
    Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):589-599. PubMed ID: 29313291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Parafoveal processing of orthographic, morphological, and semantic information during reading Arabic: A boundary paradigm investigation.
    Hermena EW; Juma EJ; AlJassmi M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0254745. PubMed ID: 34339439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What are the costs of degraded parafoveal previews during silent reading?
    Vasilev MR; Slattery TJ; Kirkby JA; Angele B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Mar; 44(3):371-386. PubMed ID: 28661179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tests of a model of multi-word reading: effects of parafoveal flanking letters on foveal word recognition.
    Grainger J; Mathôt S; Vitu F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Feb; 146():35-40. PubMed ID: 24370788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Neural Correlates of Word Recognition: A Systematic Comparison of Natural Reading and Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.
    Kornrumpf B; Niefind F; Sommer W; Dimigen O
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 28(9):1374-91. PubMed ID: 27167402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Previewing the neighborhood: the role of orthographic neighbors as parafoveal previews in reading.
    Williams CC; Perea M; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):1072-82. PubMed ID: 16846298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Flexible parafoveal encoding of character order supports word predictability effects in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements.
    Chang M; Hao L; Zhao S; Li L; Paterson KB; Wang J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):2793-2801. PubMed ID: 32406003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stable preview difficulty effects in reading with an improved variant of the boundary paradigm.
    Risse S; Seelig S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1632-1645. PubMed ID: 30501560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Eye-movement evidence for the mental representation of strokes in Chinese characters.
    Yu L; Xiong J; Zhang Q; Drieghe D; Reichle ED
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):544-551. PubMed ID: 29985038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influences on and consequences of parafoveal preview in reading.
    Luke SG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1675-1682. PubMed ID: 30088258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dissociating parafoveal preview benefit and parafovea-on-fovea effects during reading: A combined eye tracking and EEG study.
    Niefind F; Dimigen O
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Dec; 53(12):1784-1798. PubMed ID: 27680711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Forced fixations, trans-saccadic integration, and word recognition: Evidence for a hybrid mechanism of saccade triggering in reading.
    Schotter ER; von der Malsburg T; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):677-688. PubMed ID: 29999398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: a study with fixation-related brain potentials.
    Dimigen O; Kliegl R; Sommer W
    Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):381-93. PubMed ID: 22521255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.
    Risse S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):653-68. PubMed ID: 24294870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attention and eye-movement control in reading: The selective reading paradigm.
    Reingold EM; Sheridan H; Meadmore KL; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2003-2020. PubMed ID: 27643527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Parafoveal degradation during reading reduces preview costs only when it is not perceptually distinct.
    Vasilev MR; Yates M; Prueitt E; Slattery TJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Feb; 74(2):254-276. PubMed ID: 32988313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Capitalization interacts with syntactic complexity.
    Cutter MG; Martin AE; Sturt P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1146-1164. PubMed ID: 31621360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Word skipping during sentence reading: effects of lexicality on parafoveal processing.
    Choi W; Gordon PC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):201-13. PubMed ID: 24170376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Parafoveal processing of word n + 2 during reading: do the preceding words matter?
    Angele B; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1210-20. PubMed ID: 21553996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Parafoveal processing in reading.
    Schotter ER; Angele B; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 22042596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.