These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Multi-level discrepancies with sharing data on protected areas: what we have and what we need for the global village. Bertzky M; Stoll-Kleemann S J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):8-24. PubMed ID: 18207633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Degradation in landscape matrix has diverse impacts on diversity in protected areas. Häkkilä M; Le Tortorec E; Brotons L; Rajasärkkä A; Tornberg R; Mönkkönen M PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184792. PubMed ID: 28950017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Estimating the effect of protected lands on the development and conservation of their surroundings. McDonald RI; Yuan-Farrell C; Fievet C; Moeller M; Kareiva P; Foster D; Gragson T; Kinzig A; Kuby L; Redman C Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1526-36. PubMed ID: 18173476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities. Jenkins CN; Van Houtan KS; Pimm SL; Sexton JO Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(16):5081-6. PubMed ID: 25847995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Wetland suitability and connectivity for trans-Saharan migratory waterbirds. Merken R; Deboelpaep E; Teunen J; Saura S; Koedam N PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135445. PubMed ID: 26258590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Estimating soil erosion in Natura 2000 areas located on three semi-arid Mediterranean Islands. Zaimes GN; Emmanouloudis D; Iakovoglou V J Environ Biol; 2012 Mar; 33(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 23033694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Recreational Use of the Countryside: No Evidence that High Nature Value Enhances a Key Ecosystem Service. Hornigold K; Lake I; Dolman P PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165043. PubMed ID: 27828990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Montesino Pouzols F; Toivonen T; Di Minin E; Kukkala AS; Kullberg P; Kuusterä J; Lehtomäki J; Tenkanen H; Verburg PH; Moilanen A Nature; 2014 Dec; 516(7531):383-6. PubMed ID: 25494203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Measures of safeguard and rehabilitation for landscape protection planning: a qualitative approach based on diversity indicators. La Rosa D; Privitera R; Martinico F; La Greca P J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 127 Suppl():S73-83. PubMed ID: 23388187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of inverse spatial conservation prioritization to avoid biological diversity loss outside protected areas. Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Tuominen S; Kotiaho JS Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1294-303. PubMed ID: 24033397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. How Effective Are the Protected Areas of the Natura 2000 Network in Halting Biological Invasions? A Case Study in Greece. Christopoulou A; Christopoulou A; Fyllas NM; Dimitrakopoulos PG; Arianoutsou M Plants (Basel); 2021 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 34685922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of land facets to plan for climate change: conserving the arenas, not the actors. Beier P; Brost B Conserv Biol; 2010 Jun; 24(3):701-10. PubMed ID: 20067491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Local attitudes on protected areas: evidence from three Natura 2000 wetland sites in Greece. Dimitrakopoulos PG; Jones N; Iosifides T; Florokapi I; Lasda O; Paliouras F; Evangelinos KI J Environ Manage; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1847-54. PubMed ID: 20580862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of landscape context on the abundance and diversity of bees in Mediterranean olive groves. Tscheulin T; Neokosmidis L; Petanidou T; Settele J Bull Entomol Res; 2011 Oct; 101(5):557-64. PubMed ID: 21457587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patterns and predictors of β-diversity in the fragmented Brazilian Atlantic forest: a multiscale analysis of forest specialist and generalist birds. Morante-Filho JC; Arroyo-Rodríguez V; Faria D J Anim Ecol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):240-50. PubMed ID: 26399774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of cost metric on cost-effectiveness of protected-area network design in urban landscapes. Burkhalter JC; Lockwood JL; Maslo B; Fenn KH; Leu K Conserv Biol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):403-12. PubMed ID: 26395858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Even the smallest non-crop habitat islands could be beneficial: distribution of carabid beetles and spiders in agricultural landscape. Knapp M; Řezáč M PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123052. PubMed ID: 25859850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The challenge of implementing the European network of protected areas Natura 2000. Kati V; Hovardas T; Dieterich M; Ibisch PL; Mihok B; Selva N Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):260-70. PubMed ID: 25103194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Regional-scale land-cover change during the 20th century and its consequences for biodiversity. Cousins SA; Auffret AG; Lindgren J; Tränk L Ambio; 2015 Jan; 44 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S17-27. PubMed ID: 25576277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]