These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28384843)

  • 1. A design for phase I trials in completely or partially ordered groups.
    Conaway MR
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(15):2323-2332. PubMed ID: 28384843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Designs for phase I trials in ordered groups.
    Conaway MR; Wages NA
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):254-265. PubMed ID: 27624880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying a maximum tolerated contour in two-dimensional dose finding.
    Wages NA
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):242-253. PubMed ID: 26910586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Isotonic designs for phase I trials in partially ordered groups.
    Conaway M
    Clin Trials; 2017 Oct; 14(5):491-498. PubMed ID: 28776422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A default method to specify skeletons for Bayesian model averaging continual reassessment method for phase I clinical trials.
    Pan H; Yuan Y
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):266-279. PubMed ID: 26991076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shift models for dose-finding in partially ordered groups.
    Horton BJ; Wages NA; Conaway MR
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 30309262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian adaptive design for estimating the maximum tolerated dose curve using drug combinations in cancer phase I clinical trials.
    Tighiouart M; Li Q; Rogatko A
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):280-290. PubMed ID: 27060889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.
    Horton BJ; Wages NA; Conaway MR
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 27435150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering.
    Guo B; Li Y
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):859-75. PubMed ID: 25413162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Bayesian dose-finding design incorporating toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.
    Yin J; Qin R; Ezzalfani M; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 27633877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials.
    Paoletti X; Kramar A
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):3012-28. PubMed ID: 19672839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential monitoring of Phase I dose expansion cohorts.
    Iasonos A; O'Quigley J
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):204-214. PubMed ID: 26854196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Designs for single- or multiple-agent phase I trials.
    Conaway MR; Dunbar S; Peddada SD
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):661-9. PubMed ID: 15339288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling adverse event counts in phase I clinical trials of a cytotoxic agent.
    Muenz DG; Braun TM; Taylor JM
    Clin Trials; 2018 Aug; 15(4):386-397. PubMed ID: 29779418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling semi-attributable toxicity in dual-agent phase I trials with non-concurrent drug administration.
    Wheeler GM; Sweeting MJ; Mander AP; Lee SM; Cheung YK
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):225-241. PubMed ID: 26891942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toxicity-dependent feasibility bounds for the escalation with overdose control approach in phase I cancer trials.
    Wheeler GM; Sweeting MJ; Mander AP
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(16):2499-2513. PubMed ID: 28295513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phase I design for completely or partially ordered treatment schedules.
    Wages NA; O'Quigley J; Conaway MR
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(4):569-79. PubMed ID: 24114957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-stage dose finding for cytostatic agents in phase I oncology trials.
    Yin G; Zheng S; Xu J
    Stat Med; 2013 Feb; 32(4):644-60. PubMed ID: 22855354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phase I/II dose-finding design for molecularly targeted agent: Plateau determination using adaptive randomization.
    Riviere MK; Yuan Y; Jourdan JH; Dubois F; Zohar S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):466-479. PubMed ID: 26988926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bridging continual reassessment method for phase I clinical trials in different ethnic populations.
    Liu S; Pan H; Xia J; Huang Q; Yuan Y
    Stat Med; 2015 May; 34(10):1681-94. PubMed ID: 25626429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.